Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Gavin Newsom - Facial Harmony Analysis

Politician - Governor of California, Mayor of San Francisco

Gavin Newsom runs straight and forward through the profile, with high cheekbones, a wide square jaw corner head-on and a mouth cut to the right width under the nose. The face gives out below it, with a short lower face, flat eye tilt, a chin crease that never really breaks and ears that swing wide.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Caucasian
Eyes:
Green
Harmony:
6.4 / 10
Gavin Newsom front portrait
Gavin Newsom side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Gavin Newsom's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.2

out of 10

Top 23%

Side view

6.8

out of 10

Top 8.6%

Best looking out of 6 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.2/ 10 harmony
Gavin Newsom front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.3 / 10

Top third31.50%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third30.57%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

9.0
Lower third37.93%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

8.8

Face shape

8.6 / 10

Face width to height1.96

Ideal 1.96 to 2

10.0
Bitemporal width83.09%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

7.4
Midface ratio0.98

Ideal 0.97 to 1

10.0
5.7
Cheekbone height88.07%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

5.6 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt0.9 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

0.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.81

Ideal 0 to 0.45

6.9
Eye aspect ratio2.91

Ideal 3 to 3.5

9.4
Eye separation ratio43.14%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

1.6
One eye apart test1.09

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

10.0
Eyebrow tilt4.7 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

8.0
Brow length to face width0.60

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

3.4

Nose

6.4 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle84.8 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

8.2
Deviation of IAA and JFA7.1 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

4.2
Nose bridge to nose width1.99

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

8.5
Intercanthal to nasal width1.24

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

6.7
Nose tip position3.7 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

4.2

Mouth and lips

7.5 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.7 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

5.8
Chin to philtrum ratio3.81

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.98

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.1
Lip fullness0.29

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

9.9
Interpupillary to mouth width0.92

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

7.5
Mouth to nose width1.47

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

10.0
Mouth corner position3.3 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

5.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio12.04%

Ideal 8 to 12

9.9
Ear protrusion angle17.7 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.2 / 10

Jaw slope137.3 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

7.8
Bigonial width91.51%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

9.9
Lower third proportion23.61%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle91.9 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width88.53%

Ideal 92 to 98

8.3

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.8/ 10 harmony
Gavin Newsom side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.7 / 10

Browridge inclination20.3 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle127.5 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

10.0
Upper forehead slope7.8 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

0.0

Profile convexity

8.6 / 10

Z angle79.6 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

10.0
Total facial convexity145.2 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-4.5 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)172.4 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth64.6 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)167.7 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

8.6
Facial depth to height1.46

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

9.9
Interior midface projection55.6 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

8.1 / 10

Nasal width to height0.75

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.76

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

2.6
Nasolabial angle109.7 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle118.8 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

0.0
Nasomental angle130.1 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle32.3 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation17.4 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

10.0
Mid nose projection-0.1 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle32.7 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

10.0

Lips

5.6 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-1.3 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

8.9
Lower lip (Burstone)-0.9 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)3.9 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)2.6 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)7.9 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

1.3
Lower lip (E-line)5.3 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

9.3
Holdaway H line-0.0 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

5.5 / 10

Mentolabial angle148.6 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort-4.2 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

4.0
Gonial angle131.4 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

0.0
Mandibular plane angle23.5 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.1
Ramus to mandible ratio0.74

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line22.1 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

8.7 / 10

Submental cervical angle87.8 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

8.7

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal nose proportions

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to its projection and height sitting in classical proportion.

Nasal width to height (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal profile convexity

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to brow, nose base, and chin falling in a gently convex line.

Facial convexity (glabella) (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose tip rotation

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip being gently rotated without exposing the nostrils.

Nose tip rotation (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal profile line

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the chin and lips falling on a classical line.

Z angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal interior midface projection

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the midface carrying forward under the eyes at a classical angle.

Interior midface projection (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal mouth-to-nose proportion

10.0

This contributes to lower-face harmony due to the mouth being classically wider than the nose base.

Mouth to nose width (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.44

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Long chin or short philtrum

-0.43

The chin is tall for the philtrum above it, which can make the chin dominate the lower face.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.37

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

Negative canthal tilt

-0.31

The outer eye corners sit low, which can read as tired or downturned eyes.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

severeSide view

Effaced chin crease

-0.20

The crease between lip and chin is flat, which softens chin definition.

Mentolabial angle (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.