Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Gal Gadot - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Wonder Woman, Fast & Furious, Batman v Superman

Gal Gadot reads clean from the side and narrow from the front: temples that pull in tight, high cheekbones holding the under-eye up, flat ears and a jaw that cuts away from the neck. Length is the cost, with a long midface over a short chin, a thin upper lip against a full lower one and a jaw corner that rounds off head-on.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Israeli Jewish
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
6.9 / 10
Gal Gadot front portrait
Gal Gadot side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Gal Gadot's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.0

out of 10

Top 5.1%

Side view

6.7

out of 10

Top 12%

Best looking out of 10 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.0/ 10 harmony
Gal Gadot front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

7.8 / 10

Top third35.41%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

3.4
Middle third33.42%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third31.17%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

10.0

Face shape

6.9 / 10

Face width to height1.81

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

0.0
Bitemporal width80.32%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

10.0
Midface ratio0.96

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

4.5
10.0
Cheekbone height93.64%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.0 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt8.8 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

9.9
Eyebrow low setedness0.66

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.52

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

5.4
Eye separation ratio46.44%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

9.9
One eye apart test1.25

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

0.9
Eyebrow tilt14.8 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

10.0
Brow length to face width0.69

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

10.0

Nose

5.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle81.6 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA15.0 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width1.99

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

4.9
Intercanthal to nasal width0.96

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

10.0
Nose tip position1.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

6.9 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.0 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

9.2
Chin to philtrum ratio1.71

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio2.33

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

0.0
Lip fullness0.39

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.80

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

9.5
Mouth to nose width1.57

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

10.0
Mouth corner position4.3 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

9.7

Ears

8.4 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio7.64%

Ideal 8 to 12

9.8
Ear protrusion angle8.0 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

6.9

Jaw, neck and lower face

8.0 / 10

Jaw slope142.7 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

10.0
Bigonial width80.92%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

6.1
Lower third proportion34.48%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

6.9
Jaw frontal angle96.6 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

7.7
Neck width82.57%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

9.5

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.7/ 10 harmony
Gal Gadot side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

1.9 / 10

Browridge inclination28.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Nasofrontal angle128.4 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

0.0
Upper forehead slope4.7 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

5.7

Profile convexity

6.2 / 10

Z angle82.8 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

5.8
Total facial convexity151.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

3.5
Orbital vector1.5 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

10.0
Facial convexity (glabella)172.9 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

10.0
Anterior facial depth64.1 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.9
Facial convexity (nasion)168.2 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

0.0
Facial depth to height1.62

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

0.0
Interior midface projection57.2 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

8.5 / 10

Nasal width to height0.73

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.77

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

0.0
Nasolabial angle110.3 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle134.4 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle133.6 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

6.5
Nasofacial angle30.9 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

9.9
Nose tip rotation31.3 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

9.6
Mid nose projection0.3 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle42.8 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

10.0

Lips

8.2 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-1.7 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

9.9
Lower lip (Burstone)-1.5 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)2.3 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)1.1 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

8.6
Upper lip (E-line)5.3 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

9.0
Lower lip (E-line)3.1 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line-0.3 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

9.9

Chin and jaw

10.0 / 10

Mentolabial angle125.7 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort2.4 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle123.2 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle15.8 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.63

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line18.7 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle83.5 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal chin crease

10.0

This contributes to a defined chin due to the lip-chin transition being defined but soft.

Mentolabial angle (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow length

10.0

This contributes to a framed eye area due to the brows spanning the eyes in proportion to the face.

Brow length to face width (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose tip definition

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip being defined without being pinched.

Nasal tip angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal interior midface projection

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the midface carrying forward under the eyes at a classical angle.

Interior midface projection (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Heavy lower lip

-0.33

The lower lip is much fuller than the upper, which can unbalance the mouth.

Lower to upper lip ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.32

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeSide view

Receding forehead

-0.27

The forehead leans back strongly, which can weaken the upper profile.

Browridge inclination (side view)

severeSide view

Deep face for its height

-0.26

The face carries far back for its height, which can read heavy in profile.

Facial depth to height (side view)

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.23

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Gal Gadot's strongest and weakest features

Gal Gadot scores 6.90 overall, with an even front and side (7.04 and 6.66). Her brows, nose and jaw are her strongest features, and her costs come from the lips, the jaw taper and the forehead and depth in profile.

From the front, her middle and lower thirds and her temples are in band, her full face is ideally proportioned for its width, and her cheekbones sit high. Her brows are set low, tilted correctly and the right length for the face. Her nose is sized correctly to the space between her eyes and its tip sits level with her nostrils. Her lips are full, her mouth is the right width for her nose, and her jaw slope is ideal. In profile, her orbital vector and facial convexity are in band, her nose length, nose angles, bridge line and the incline of the underside of her nose are ideal, her midface carries her nose base forward correctly, her lower lip sits on the Burstone and E-line references, her chin sits at the right depth, and her mentolabial angle, jaw corner angle, jaw plane, rear jaw length and jaw corner height are all ideal.

Her largest cost is her lips: her upper lip is thin against her lower, at a ratio of 2.33 where 1.55 to 1.85 is ideal, which takes about 0.33 of a point. Her jaw angle differs from the angle from her nose base to her outer eye corners by 15 degrees, against 1.73 or less. Her midface reads long for the width of her cheekbones, at 1.81 against 1.94 to 1.98, and her chin is short, at 1.71 times her philtrum against 2.15 to 2.45. In profile, her forehead leans back from the brow, at 28.6 degrees against 15 to 22, which is her weakest single metric at 1.32 out of 10, and her face is deep for its height, at 1.62 against 1.3 to 1.44.