Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Florence Pugh - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Midsommar, Little Women, Oppenheimer

A compact midface with cheekbones at the right height, full balanced lips sitting exactly on the profile line, a scooped nose angled well off the lip, and a flat jawline with a strong corner. A long lower face with a long chin, a jaw that tapers to a narrow point, close-set eyes under flat brows with little tilt, an upturned nose tip and a soft line into the neck hold it back.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
British
Eyes:
Hazel
Harmony:
6.0 / 10
Florence Pugh front portrait
Florence Pugh side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Florence Pugh's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

5.2

out of 10

Top 48%

Side view

7.3

out of 10

Top 2.6%

Best looking out of 3 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.2/ 10 harmony
Florence Pugh front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

4.3 / 10

Top third28.55%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

2.9
Middle third34.69%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third36.76%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

0.0

Face shape

8.2 / 10

Face width to height1.94

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

9.9
Bitemporal width86.65%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

9.7
Midface ratio1.06

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

10.0
1.4
Cheekbone height86.68%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

5.4 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt4.2 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

2.4
Eyebrow low setedness1.02

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

9.9
Eye aspect ratio2.73

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

9.9
Eye separation ratio43.68%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

0.0
One eye apart test0.92

Ideal 0.95 to 1

5.5
Eyebrow tilt5.4 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

0.0
Brow length to face width0.64

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

9.9

Nose

7.2 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle90.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA18.1 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.21

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

10.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.14

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

6.1
Nose tip position1.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

6.9 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.2 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

9.9
Chin to philtrum ratio2.95

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.73

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.38

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.83

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

7.7
Mouth to nose width1.47

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

6.5
Mouth corner position-1.1 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

4.2

Ears

5.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio9.55%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle15.3 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

3.6 / 10

Jaw slope135.9 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

0.2
Bigonial width83.54%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

9.9
Lower third proportion28.74%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle108.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Neck width83.73%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

7.7

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.3/ 10 harmony
Florence Pugh side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

7.2 / 10

Browridge inclination20.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle133.1 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

2.3
Upper forehead slope5.9 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

9.3

Profile convexity

7.9 / 10

Z angle72.7 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

4.5
Total facial convexity148.7 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

9.2
Orbital vector-2.1 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

1.6
Facial convexity (glabella)168.6 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

10.0
Anterior facial depth69.8 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.2
Facial convexity (nasion)165.4 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

8.5
Facial depth to height1.44

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

9.9
Interior midface projection60.0 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

9.9

Nose

5.4 / 10

Nasal width to height0.66

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

9.4
Nasal projection0.70

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

4.2
Nasolabial angle106.5 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle134.5 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle135.4 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

1.1
Nasofacial angle28.7 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

3.8
Nose tip rotation37.5 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

0.0
Mid nose projection-3.4 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

0.0
Frankfort tip angle46.3 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

10.0

Lips

10.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-4.9 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.7 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)-1.2 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)-0.5 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

10.0
Upper lip (E-line)1.5 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)1.1 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

9.9
Holdaway H line0.2 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

8.3 / 10

Mentolabial angle130.3 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort-4.3 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

0.1
Gonial angle123.0 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle20.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.60

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.9
Gonion to mouth line14.4 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle125.1 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal midface ratio

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious midface due to eye spacing and midface length sitting in proportion.

Midface ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal alar angle

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base sitting in classical relation to the eye corners.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose flare

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the base widening in proportion to the bridge.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose tip height

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip riding slightly above the nostril line.

Nose tip position (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.41

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.39

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Long lower face

-0.34

The lower face takes up more than its classical share, which can make the chin and jaw dominate the face.

Lower third (front view)

severeFront view

Square lower face

-0.32

The jawlines run wide apart, which squares the lower face.

Jaw frontal angle (front view)

severeFront view

Long chin or short philtrum

-0.30

The chin is tall for the philtrum above it, which can make the chin dominate the lower face.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.