Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Ezra Miller - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - The Perks of Being a Wallflower, The Flash, We Need to Talk About Kevin

Ezra Miller reads long and delicate, with a well-set nose over lips that land on the line, an even nasolabial angle and a jaw that holds its plane from the side. The face is far too narrow for its height, with wide-spaced eyes under high flat brows, almost no canthal tilt, a jaw that slopes rather than turns, and a chin and lower lip that both fall back behind the profile.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
American Jewish
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
6.2 / 10
Ezra Miller front portrait
Ezra Miller side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Ezra Miller's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

5.5

out of 10

Top 43%

Side view

7.3

out of 10

Top 2.4%

Best looking out of 4 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.5/ 10 harmony
Ezra Miller front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

5.9 / 10

Top third28.65%

Ideal 30 to 32

5.5
Middle third35.52%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

2.1
Lower third35.83%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

5.9 / 10

Face width to height1.59

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width94.38%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.5
Midface ratio0.98

Ideal 0.97 to 1

10.0
0.0
Cheekbone height84.66%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

3.8 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt1.5 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

0.0
Eyebrow low setedness1.44

Ideal 0 to 0.45

0.0
Eye aspect ratio2.87

Ideal 3 to 3.5

8.7
Eye separation ratio49.15%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

0.0
One eye apart test1.16

Ideal 0.95 to 1

0.0
Eyebrow tilt4.7 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

8.1
Brow length to face width0.71

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

10.0

Nose

7.2 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle86.2 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Deviation of IAA and JFA12.7 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.09

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

10.0
Intercanthal to nasal width0.98

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

6.2
Nose tip position1.7 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

8.4 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.6 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

4.3
Chin to philtrum ratio2.00

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

6.5
Lower to upper lip ratio1.87

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.9
Lip fullness0.37

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

8.9
Interpupillary to mouth width0.79

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

9.0
Mouth to nose width1.49

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

10.0
Mouth corner position0.7 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

9.8 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio9.67%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle12.0 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

9.6

Jaw, neck and lower face

5.8 / 10

Jaw slope133.4 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

0.0
Bigonial width93.08%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

9.3
Lower third proportion33.76%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

9.5
Jaw frontal angle98.9 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

4.3
Neck width86.80%

Ideal 92 to 98

5.9

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.3/ 10 harmony
Ezra Miller side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

5.9 / 10

Browridge inclination23.8 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.7
Nasofrontal angle141.7 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

0.0
Upper forehead slope3.9 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

7.8

Profile convexity

6.4 / 10

Z angle73.8 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

1.4
Total facial convexity138.5 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

9.2
Orbital vector-2.4 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.9
Facial convexity (glabella)166.6 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

3.4
Anterior facial depth66.9 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)164.6 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

10.0
Facial depth to height1.43

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection62.8 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

6.1

Nose

8.7 / 10

Nasal width to height0.64

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

9.9
Nasal projection0.67

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

10.0
Nasolabial angle100.6 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle131.2 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle129.5 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle32.2 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation29.3 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.0
Mid nose projection-0.5 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle40.9 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

8.8

Lips

4.9 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-4.7 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-5.9 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

0.0
Upper lip (S-line)-0.0 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)-3.2 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)3.4 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)-1.2 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

4.5
Holdaway H line-3.2 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

0.0

Chin and jaw

9.0 / 10

Mentolabial angle129.6 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

9.7
Recession relative to Frankfort-3.8 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

4.8
Gonial angle115.8 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle21.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.59

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.3
Gonion to mouth line15.0 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

9.7 / 10

Submental cervical angle108.1 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

9.7

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal midface ratio

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious midface due to eye spacing and midface length sitting in proportion.

Midface ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow length

10.0

This contributes to a framed eye area due to the brows spanning the eyes in proportion to the face.

Brow length to face width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose flare

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the base widening in proportion to the bridge.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose tip height

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip riding slightly above the nostril line.

Nose tip position (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.60

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Long, narrow face shape

-0.35

The face is long for its width, which can read stretched.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Negative canthal tilt

-0.30

The outer eye corners sit low, which can read as tired or downturned eyes.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.30

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

High-set brows

-0.28

The brows sit high above the eyes, which can read surprised and soften eye-area definition.

Eyebrow low setedness (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.