Celebrity analysis
How attractive is Ezra Miller - Facial Harmony Analysis
Actor - The Perks of Being a Wallflower, The Flash, We Need to Talk About Kevin
Ezra Miller reads long and delicate, with a well-set nose over lips that land on the line, an even nasolabial angle and a jaw that holds its plane from the side. The face is far too narrow for its height, with wide-spaced eyes under high flat brows, almost no canthal tilt, a jaw that slopes rather than turns, and a chin and lower lip that both fall back behind the profile.
- Gender:
- Male
- Ethnicity:
- American Jewish
- Eyes:
- Brown
- Harmony:
- 6.1 / 10
Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.
Signature tool
See my closest celebrity match
Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.
Harmony report
Ezra Miller's facial harmony
Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.
Overall harmony
6.1
out of 10
Top 26%
Front view
5.4
out of 10
Top 45%
Side view
7.3
out of 10
Top 2.4%
Best looking out of 4 people
Front harmony
Front analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Facial thirds
5.9 / 10
Face shape
5.9 / 10
Eyes and brows
3.8 / 10
Nose
7.2 / 10
Mouth and lips
8.5 / 10
Ears
9.8 / 10
Jaw, neck and lower face
5.8 / 10
Side harmony
Side analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Forehead and brow
5.9 / 10
Profile convexity
6.4 / 10
Nose
8.7 / 10
Lips
4.9 / 10
Chin and jaw
9.0 / 10
Neck
9.7 / 10
Biggest strengths
These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.
Ideal upper lip position (E-line)
10.0This contributes to balanced lips due to the upper lip sitting classically just behind Ricketts' E-line.
Upper lip (E-line) (side view)
Ideal profile convexity at the nasion
10.0This contributes to a balanced profile due to nasal root, nose base, and chin falling in a gently convex line.
Facial convexity (nasion) (side view)
Ideal midface ratio
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to eye spacing and midface length sitting in proportion.
Midface ratio (front view)
Ideal nose tip height
10.0This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip sitting just below the nostril line.
Nose tip position (front view)
Straight nasal bridge
10.0This contributes to a refined profile due to the bridge running straight from root to tip.
Mid nose projection (side view)
Ideal nose flare
10.0This contributes to a refined nose due to the base widening in proportion to the bridge.
Nose bridge to nose width (front view)
Areas to improve
5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.
Narrow midface
-0.60The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.
Face width to height (front view)
Long, narrow face shape
-0.35The face is long for its width, which can read stretched.
Total facial width to height ratio (front view)
Negative canthal tilt
-0.31The outer eye corners sit low, which can read as tired or downturned eyes.
Lateral canthal tilt (front view)
Midface-jaw mismatch
-0.30The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.
Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)
Wide intercanthal spacing
-0.29There is more than one eye-width of space between the eyes, which reads wide-set.
One eye apart test (front view)
Celebrity lookalikes
Both profilesLoading the celebrity library...
Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.
Ezra Miller's strongest and weakest features
Ezra Miller scores 6.13 overall, and the profile is clearly stronger than the front: 7.32 side against 5.39 front. The nose and lips are the strongest features, and most of the cost comes from the shape of the face and the eye area seen head-on.
From the front, the lower third and midface ratio are in band, the cheekbones sit high, and the brows are the right length for the face. The nose bridge is ideally proportioned to the nostrils, and the mouth is sized correctly to the nose, with mouth corners that sit well. The ears sit flat. In profile, the facial depth, nose projection and nose angles are all ideal, the upper lip sits on all three lip references, and the jaw corner and jaw plane are ideal.
The largest cost is that the midface reads long for the width of the cheekbones, at 1.59 against an ideal of 1.96 to 2, which takes about 0.60 of a point. The full face also reads long for its width, at a height to cheekbone width ratio of 1.43 against 1.34 to 1.37. The eye area costs next: the outer eye corners tilt up only 1.5 degrees where 6 to 7.7 is ideal, the eyes are set wide for their length at 1.35 eye widths apart against 1.05 to 1.1, and the brows sit high above the eyes, at 1.44 against 0 to 0.45. The jaw angle and the angle from the base of the nose to the outer eye corners differ by 12.7 degrees, against an ideal of 2.5 or less.