Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Estelle Ogilvy - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model and influencer - Storm Management, Longines, Paris Fashion Week

Estelle Ogilvy has high cheekbones, long brows, full lips and a sharp jaw corner over a well-proportioned chin. Her face runs long and narrow through the lower third, her brows sit flat, her nose projects strongly off a deep bridge dip and her cheeks sit flat under the eyes.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
French and English
Eyes:
Green
Harmony:
6.9 / 10
Estelle Ogilvy front portrait
Estelle Ogilvy side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Estelle Ogilvy's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.0

out of 10

Top 5.1%

Side view

6.8

out of 10

Top 9.8%

Best looking out of 20 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.0/ 10 harmony
Estelle Ogilvy front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

3.1 / 10

Top third28.35%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

1.6
Middle third35.78%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

7.7
Lower third35.88%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

0.0

Face shape

7.2 / 10

Face width to height1.98

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

9.9
Bitemporal width87.88%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

7.7
Midface ratio1.10

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

8.5
0.0
Cheekbone height89.08%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

7.2 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt4.7 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

4.5
Eyebrow low setedness1.07

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

9.6
Eye aspect ratio2.76

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

9.9
Eye separation ratio45.07%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

6.0
One eye apart test1.11

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

9.9
Eyebrow tilt4.2 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

0.0
Brow length to face width0.64

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

10.0

Nose

7.2 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle92.4 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA7.6 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

1.4
Nose bridge to nose width2.36

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

6.1
Intercanthal to nasal width1.11

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

8.5
Nose tip position0.8 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

8.7 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.6 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

4.9
Chin to philtrum ratio2.25

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.53

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.9
Lip fullness0.35

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.83

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

8.0
Mouth to nose width1.48

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

7.9
Mouth corner position0.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

5.7 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.45%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle14.9 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

1.3

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.5 / 10

Jaw slope142.9 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

10.0
Bigonial width81.12%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

6.7
Lower third proportion33.46%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle100.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

2.5
Neck width83.30%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

8.6

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.8/ 10 harmony
Estelle Ogilvy side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

4.4 / 10

Browridge inclination13.2 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

8.7
Nasofrontal angle130.4 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

0.0
Upper forehead slope4.4 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

4.4

Profile convexity

6.6 / 10

Z angle73.0 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

5.4
Total facial convexity144.5 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-3.5 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)169.9 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

10.0
Anterior facial depth66.0 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)165.3 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

8.7
Facial depth to height1.62

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

0.0
Interior midface projection62.7 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

8.5

Nose

7.4 / 10

Nasal width to height0.74

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.77

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

0.0
Nasolabial angle91.8 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

5.8
Nasal tip angle124.2 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

6.4
Nasomental angle126.8 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle35.5 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

9.7
Nose tip rotation24.7 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

10.0
Mid nose projection-2.3 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

6.1
Frankfort tip angle37.7 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

8.8

Lips

4.8 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-6.0 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

9.4
Lower lip (Burstone)-5.4 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

0.6
Upper lip (S-line)-1.9 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

9.2
Lower lip (S-line)-3.0 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)1.3 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)-1.2 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

4.4
Holdaway H line-1.9 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

0.0

Chin and jaw

9.8 / 10

Mentolabial angle134.5 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

9.9
Recession relative to Frankfort0.2 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

9.5
Gonial angle123.2 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle18.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.67

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line12.0 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

9.2

Neck

6.5 / 10

Submental cervical angle111.5 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

6.5

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal midface projection

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the nose base carrying classically forward of the ear.

Anterior facial depth (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose tip rotation

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip being gently rotated without exposing the nostrils.

Nose tip rotation (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose proportions

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to its projection and height sitting in classical proportion.

Nasal width to height (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal jawline slope

10.0

This contributes to a defined profile due to the jawline running at a classical slope from corner to chin.

Mandibular plane angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal upper lip position (E-line)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the upper lip sitting classically just behind Ricketts' E-line.

Upper lip (E-line) (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal jaw length

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.

Ramus to mandible ratio (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Short, wide face shape

-0.32

The face is short for its width, which can read compact and heavy.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Flat eyebrow tilt

-0.28

The brows rise little toward their peaks, which can read heavy or tired.

Eyebrow tilt (front view)

severeSide view

Deep face for its height

-0.26

The face carries far back for its height, which can read heavy in profile.

Facial depth to height (side view)

severeFront view

Long lower face

-0.25

The lower face takes up more than its classical share, which can make the chin and jaw dominate the face.

Lower third (front view)

severeSide view

Over-projected nose tip

-0.16

The tip projects far for the bridge length, which can dominate the profile.

Nasal projection (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.