Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Erling Haaland - Facial Harmony Analysis

Footballer - Manchester City, Norway national team, Premier League Golden Boot

Erling Haaland runs perfectly even thirds under low-set brows and upturned eyes, with high cheekbones and a profile that is the stronger half, lips landing right on the line from nose to chin over a chin that carries forward. The upper face is where it falls off, with very wide temples on a short face, close-set and rounded eye openings, a wide nose base, a short chin under a long philtrum and no line between jaw and neck.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Norwegian
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
6.1 / 10
Erling Haaland front portrait
Erling Haaland side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Erling Haaland's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

5.4

out of 10

Top 45%

Side view

7.4

out of 10

Top 1.9%

Best looking out of 4 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.4/ 10 harmony
Erling Haaland front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third30.90%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third33.18%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third35.92%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

4.9 / 10

Face width to height1.93

Ideal 1.96 to 2

9.4
Bitemporal width105.30%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Midface ratio0.90

Ideal 0.97 to 1

5.2
0.0
Cheekbone height90.92%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

5.5 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt8.8 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

8.4
Eyebrow low setedness0.16

Ideal 0 to 0.45

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.34

Ideal 3 to 3.5

0.0
Eye separation ratio42.99%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

0.7
One eye apart test1.14

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

9.5
Eyebrow tilt10.2 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

10.0
Brow length to face width0.57

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

0.0

Nose

3.6 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle79.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA11.7 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.21

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

8.1
Intercanthal to nasal width1.33

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

0.0
Nose tip position1.4 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

6.4 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.9 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

10.0
Chin to philtrum ratio1.66

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio2.24

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

1.7
Lip fullness0.36

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

9.9
Interpupillary to mouth width0.88

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

9.9
Mouth to nose width1.32

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

3.9
Mouth corner position4.8 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

9.1

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.71%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle11.3 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

10.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.2 / 10

Jaw slope144.9 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

7.8
Bigonial width85.13%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

8.2
Lower third proportion35.46%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle90.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width98.51%

Ideal 92 to 98

9.9

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.4/ 10 harmony
Erling Haaland side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

10.0 / 10

Browridge inclination18.0 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle119.2 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

10.0
Upper forehead slope1.1 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

10.0

Profile convexity

7.7 / 10

Z angle75.9 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

7.7
Total facial convexity144.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-0.1 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

9.0
Facial convexity (glabella)174.1 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth69.1 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.5
Facial convexity (nasion)168.7 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

6.1
Facial depth to height1.50

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

9.2
Interior midface projection66.6 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

0.0

Nose

6.3 / 10

Nasal width to height0.77

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.76

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

3.6
Nasolabial angle97.2 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle144.0 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

0.8
Nasomental angle126.4 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle37.1 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

7.5
Nose tip rotation26.9 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.4
Mid nose projection-0.1 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle44.2 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

4.5

Lips

6.5 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-4.4 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-5.1 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

3.1
Upper lip (S-line)0.5 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)-1.8 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

2.9
Upper lip (E-line)4.1 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)0.6 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

9.8
Holdaway H line-2.2 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

0.0

Chin and jaw

9.8 / 10

Mentolabial angle131.1 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

9.0
Recession relative to Frankfort5.9 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle117.5 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle16.9 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.73

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line24.8 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle141.3 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal upper lip position (S-line)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the upper lip sitting on Steiner's S-line.

Upper lip (S-line) (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose tip height

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip riding slightly above the nostril line.

Nose tip position (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal forehead contour

10.0

This contributes to a pleasant profile due to the forehead curving gently between brow and hairline.

Upper forehead slope (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal forehead slope

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the forehead leaning back at a classical angle.

Browridge inclination (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Short, wide face shape

-0.36

The face is short for its width, which can read compact and heavy.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.33

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow alar angle

-0.33

The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

severeFront view

Low-set mouth

-0.33

The mouth sits low in the lower third, which shortens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Long philtrum or short chin

-0.33

The philtrum is long for the chin below it, which can make the lower face read bottom-light.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.