Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Emma Watson - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Harry Potter, Beauty and the Beast, Little Women

Emma Watson has both frame and eye area, with a compact face, high cheekbones, low-set brows and long almond eyes that sit in harmony with the jaw line. The softness is at the edges, with wide temples, slightly close-set eyes and a chin that sits a little back on the profile.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Caucasian
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
7.6 / 10
Emma Watson front portrait
Emma Watson side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Emma Watson's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.5

out of 10

Top 1.3%

Side view

7.8

out of 10

Top 0.4%

Best looking out of 100 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.5/ 10 harmony
Emma Watson front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.8 / 10

Top third34.09%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

9.6
Middle third32.36%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third33.55%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

9.7

Face shape

7.3 / 10

Face width to height1.97

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

10.0
Bitemporal width91.35%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

0.0
Midface ratio1.02

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

9.9
6.4
Cheekbone height92.52%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

7.3 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt3.9 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

1.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.84

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio3.23

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

10.0
Eye separation ratio44.06%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

0.0
One eye apart test1.10

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

9.9
Eyebrow tilt9.7 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

9.9
Brow length to face width0.64

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

9.9

Nose

7.8 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle87.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA1.3 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

10.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.64

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.09

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

9.1
Nose tip position1.4 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

7.8 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.9 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

8.6
Chin to philtrum ratio2.38

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.97

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

6.7
Lip fullness0.31

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

4.4
Interpupillary to mouth width0.80

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

9.7
Mouth to nose width1.45

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

4.9
Mouth corner position2.7 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

7.9 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.33%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle13.8 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

5.7

Jaw, neck and lower face

3.9 / 10

Jaw slope149.4 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

2.2
Bigonial width78.93%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

0.0
Lower third proportion30.61%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

7.1
Jaw frontal angle89.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width86.64%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

0.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.8/ 10 harmony
Emma Watson side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.7 / 10

Browridge inclination6.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Nasofrontal angle139.3 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

9.9
Upper forehead slope7.0 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

10.0

Profile convexity

8.5 / 10

Z angle77.3 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

10.0
Total facial convexity144.2 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector0.1 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

9.4
Facial convexity (glabella)170.7 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

10.0
Anterior facial depth65.3 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)168.9 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

0.0
Facial depth to height1.47

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

8.3
Interior midface projection57.4 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

7.7 / 10

Nasal width to height0.69

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.71

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

2.4
Nasolabial angle105.8 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle137.3 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle134.2 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

4.8
Nasofacial angle29.5 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

7.3
Nose tip rotation21.6 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

10.0
Mid nose projection-1.4 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

9.9
Frankfort tip angle35.6 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

5.0

Lips

7.9 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.2 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-1.3 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)2.3 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)1.4 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

7.1
Upper lip (E-line)5.7 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

8.4
Lower lip (E-line)3.5 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line0.0 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

7.5 / 10

Mentolabial angle136.6 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

9.6
Recession relative to Frankfort-7.5 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

0.0
Gonial angle122.5 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle20.9 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.59

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.8
Gonion to mouth line9.9 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

5.5

Neck

9.3 / 10

Submental cervical angle108.7 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

9.3

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal nasolabial angle

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose-lip transition due to the angle under the nose sitting in its classical range.

Nasolabial angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal profile convexity

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to brow, nose base, and chin falling in a gently convex line.

Facial convexity (glabella) (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose tip height

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip riding slightly above the nostril line.

Nose tip position (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal ear set

10.0

This contributes to a clean facial outline due to the ears sitting close to the head.

Ear protrusion ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower face taper

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jawlines tapering at a classical angle.

Jaw frontal angle (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Flared nose base

-0.28

The nose base is wide relative to the bridge, which can make the nostrils read flared.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

severeFront view

Wide forehead

-0.20

The temples are wide against the cheekbones, which makes the upper face read heavy.

Bitemporal width (front view)

severeSide view

Vertical forehead

-0.18

The forehead rises steeply with little backward lean, which can read bulging in profile.

Browridge inclination (side view)

severeSide view

Recessed chin

-0.18

The chin falls behind the nasion perpendicular, which reads as a weak chin in profile.

Recession relative to Frankfort (side view)

severeFront view

Wide neck

-0.17

The neck is wide against the jaw, which can blur the jawline's definition.

Neck width (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.