Celebrity analysis
How attractive is Emily Ratajkowski - Facial Harmony Analysis
Model and writer - Blurred Lines, Gone Girl, My Body
Head-on it is close to even: thirds that stack right, a face wide for its height, high cheekbones, tilted eyes under low tilted brows and full lips balanced against each other. The profile is where it gives, with a chin set well back behind the brow and lips, a soft line from jaw to neck, a nose that projects forward and drops at the tip, and wide temples over a bridge broad for the nose.
- Gender:
- Female
- Ethnicity:
- Polish-Irish American
- Eyes:
- Brown
- Harmony:
- 7.2 / 10
Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.
Signature tool
See my closest celebrity match
Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.
Harmony report
Emily Ratajkowski's facial harmony
Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.
Overall harmony
7.2
out of 10
Top 3.4%
Front view
8.4
out of 10
Top 0.02%
Side view
5.2
out of 10
Top 47%
Best looking out of 30 people
Front harmony
Front analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Facial thirds
10.0 / 10
Face shape
6.7 / 10
Eyes and brows
9.2 / 10
Nose
6.0 / 10
Mouth and lips
8.6 / 10
Ears
10.0 / 10
Jaw, neck and lower face
8.7 / 10
Side harmony
Side analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Forehead and brow
6.4 / 10
Profile convexity
6.0 / 10
Nose
4.8 / 10
Lips
9.6 / 10
Chin and jaw
7.1 / 10
Neck
0.0 / 10
Biggest strengths
These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.
Ideal upper third
10.0This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.
Top third (front view)
Ideal middle third
10.0This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.
Middle third (front view)
Ideal lower third
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.
Lower third (front view)
Ideal midface compactness
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to cheekbone width and midface height sitting in classical proportion.
Face width to height (front view)
Ideal cheekbone height
10.0This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.
Cheekbone height (front view)
Ideal canthal tilt
10.0This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the outer corners sitting gently above the inner corners.
Lateral canthal tilt (front view)
Areas to improve
5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.
Wide forehead
-0.28The temples are wide against the cheekbones, which makes the upper face read heavy.
Bitemporal width (front view)
Recessed chin
-0.28The chin falls behind the nasion perpendicular, which reads as a weak chin in profile.
Recession relative to Frankfort (side view)
Retruded chin or protrusive lips
-0.27The chin sits behind the lips' line, which reads as a weak chin or forward lips.
Z angle (side view)
Low-hanging nose tip
-0.23The tip sits low against the Frankfort horizontal, which reads as a drooping nose.
Frankfort tip angle (side view)
Midface-jaw mismatch
-0.20The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.
Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)
Celebrity lookalikes
Both profilesLoading the celebrity library...
Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.