Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Emily Ratajkowski - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model and writer - Blurred Lines, Gone Girl, My Body

Head-on it is close to even: thirds that stack right, a face wide for its height, high cheekbones, tilted eyes under low tilted brows and full lips balanced against each other. The profile is where it gives, with a chin set well back behind the brow and lips, a soft line from jaw to neck, a nose that projects forward and drops at the tip, and wide temples over a bridge broad for the nose.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Polish-Irish American
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
7.2 / 10
Emily Ratajkowski front portrait
Emily Ratajkowski side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Emily Ratajkowski's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

8.4

out of 10

Top 0.02%

Side view

5.2

out of 10

Top 47%

Best looking out of 30 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.4/ 10 harmony
Emily Ratajkowski front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third32.87%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

10.0
Middle third33.98%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third33.15%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

10.0

Face shape

6.7 / 10

Face width to height1.95

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

10.0
Bitemporal width95.83%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

0.0
Midface ratio1.09

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

9.5
3.7
Cheekbone height91.80%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

9.4 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt8.3 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.65

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.54

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

6.1
Eye separation ratio47.96%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

9.6
One eye apart test1.12

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

9.9
Eyebrow tilt13.9 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

10.0
Brow length to face width0.68

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

10.0

Nose

6.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle88.9 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA10.3 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width1.86

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.07

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

9.8
Nose tip position2.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

8.6 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.1 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

9.6
Chin to philtrum ratio2.12

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

9.9
Lower to upper lip ratio1.79

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.40

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.79

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

9.9
Mouth to nose width1.42

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

0.5
Mouth corner position0.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio8.77%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle10.9 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

10.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

8.7 / 10

Jaw slope141.4 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

9.9
Bigonial width82.82%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

9.7
Lower third proportion33.44%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle99.2 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

3.8
Neck width81.88%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

9.9

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.2/ 10 harmony
Emily Ratajkowski side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.4 / 10

Browridge inclination9.7 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Nasofrontal angle137.5 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

9.2
Upper forehead slope6.6 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

9.9

Profile convexity

6.0 / 10

Z angle62.0 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

0.0
Total facial convexity134.4 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

0.0
Orbital vector-0.5 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

7.8
Facial convexity (glabella)164.3 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

2.5
Anterior facial depth71.2 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

7.6
Facial convexity (nasion)162.4 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

10.0
Facial depth to height1.41

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection61.0 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

9.8

Nose

4.8 / 10

Nasal width to height0.75

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.74

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

0.0
Nasolabial angle86.6 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

0.0
Nasal tip angle137.1 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle122.1 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

1.0
Nasofacial angle36.1 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

8.4
Nose tip rotation15.5 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

3.6
Mid nose projection0.0 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle28.1 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

0.0

Lips

9.6 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-6.0 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

9.5
Lower lip (Burstone)-3.9 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.1
Upper lip (S-line)-1.4 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)-1.3 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

9.9
Upper lip (E-line)2.0 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)0.5 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

9.7
Holdaway H line-0.6 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

9.1

Chin and jaw

7.1 / 10

Mentolabial angle124.2 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort-14.0 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

0.0
Gonial angle116.9 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

9.8
Mandibular plane angle20.3 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.58

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.6
Gonion to mouth line8.9 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

3.3

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle119.8 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal brow length

10.0

This contributes to a framed eye area due to the brows spanning the eyes in proportion to the face.

Brow length to face width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose proportions

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to its projection and height sitting in classical proportion.

Nasal width to height (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal ear angle

10.0

This contributes to a clean facial outline due to the ears angling close to the head.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal upper lip position (E-line)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the upper lip sitting classically just behind Ricketts' E-line.

Upper lip (E-line) (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal profile convexity at the nasion

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to nasal root, nose base, and chin falling in a gently convex line.

Facial convexity (nasion) (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Wide forehead

-0.28

The temples are wide against the cheekbones, which makes the upper face read heavy.

Bitemporal width (front view)

severeSide view

Recessed chin

-0.28

The chin falls behind the nasion perpendicular, which reads as a weak chin in profile.

Recession relative to Frankfort (side view)

severeSide view

Retruded chin or protrusive lips

-0.27

The chin sits behind the lips' line, which reads as a weak chin or forward lips.

Z angle (side view)

severeSide view

Low-hanging nose tip

-0.23

The tip sits low against the Frankfort horizontal, which reads as a drooping nose.

Frankfort tip angle (side view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.20

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Emily Ratajkowski's strongest and weakest features

Emily Ratajkowski scores 7.22 overall, and her front clearly outscores her profile: 8.43 front against 5.25 side. Her facial proportions, eye area and lips are her strongest features, and her costs come from wide temples and a chin that sits back in profile.

From the front, all three facial thirds are in band, her midface is ideally proportioned for the width of her cheekbones, and her cheekbones sit high. Her eye area is strong: her outer eye corners tilt correctly, and her brows are set low, tilted correctly and the right length for the face. The angle from the base of her nose to her outer eye corners is ideal and her nose tip sits level with her nostrils. Her lips are full and sized correctly to each other, her mouth corners sit well, the split of her lower third between lip and chin is ideal, and her ears sit flat. In profile, her facial convexity and facial depth are in band, her nose length, tip angle and bridge line are ideal, her upper lip sits on the S-line and E-line references, and her mentolabial angle and jaw plane are ideal.

Her largest cost is wide temples, at 95.8% of her cheekbone width where 80.1 to 85.7% is ideal, which takes about 0.28 of a point. Her nose bridge reads wide against the width of her nostrils, at 1.86 against 2.14 to 2.22, and her jaw angle differs from the angle from her nose base to her outer eye corners by 10.3 degrees, against 1.73 or less. In profile, her chin sits back, at -14 against 1.5 to 15, which is her weakest single metric at 1.84 out of 10, and with it her lips sit ahead of her chin, at a Z angle of 62 degrees against 76.6 to 80. The underside of her nose runs flatter than ideal, at 28.1 degrees against 39.8 to 47.3.