Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Elle Fanning - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - The Great, Maleficent, Somewhere

Elle Fanning has the eye area and the mouth doing the work: high cheekbones under low tilted brows, upturned eyes, and lips sized and set right against the nose and chin in profile. Lower down and out at the sides it gives, with wide temples, a long lower face, a nose that projects hard off a sharply cut root to an upturned tip, and eyes set close and round rather than long.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Caucasian
Eyes:
Green
Harmony:
6.6 / 10
Elle Fanning front portrait
Elle Fanning side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Elle Fanning's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.7

out of 10

Top 11%

Side view

6.5

out of 10

Top 16%

Best looking out of 8 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.7/ 10 harmony
Elle Fanning front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

7.1 / 10

Top third32.09%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

10.0
Middle third33.01%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third34.90%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

1.2

Face shape

7.0 / 10

Face width to height1.95

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

10.0
Bitemporal width91.84%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

0.0
Midface ratio1.04

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

10.0
4.9
Cheekbone height91.91%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

6.8 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt7.2 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.77

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.33

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

0.0
Eye separation ratio44.36%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

1.6
One eye apart test1.08

Ideal 0.95 to 1

6.3
Eyebrow tilt12.1 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

10.0
Brow length to face width0.65

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

10.0

Nose

6.6 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle89.3 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA9.3 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width1.96

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

2.9
Intercanthal to nasal width1.05

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

10.0
Nose tip position2.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

6.5 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.5 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

3.3
Chin to philtrum ratio2.60

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

7.7
Lower to upper lip ratio1.82

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.28

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

0.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.86

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

4.5
Mouth to nose width1.52

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

9.9
Mouth corner position3.1 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

4.5 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio12.67%

Ideal 8 to 12

9.0
Ear protrusion angle15.3 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

6.4 / 10

Jaw slope138.8 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

6.9
Bigonial width86.41%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

10.0
Lower third proportion29.67%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle98.5 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

4.9
Neck width77.76%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.5/ 10 harmony
Elle Fanning side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.3 / 10

Browridge inclination22.7 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

8.9
Nasofrontal angle122.1 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

0.0
Upper forehead slope8.1 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

10.0

Profile convexity

4.7 / 10

Z angle83.3 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

4.1
Total facial convexity151.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

3.7
Orbital vector-3.2 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)174.8 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

9.5
Anterior facial depth66.3 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)169.4 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

0.0
Facial depth to height1.58

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

0.0
Interior midface projection54.3 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

6.8 / 10

Nasal width to height0.74

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.82

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

0.0
Nasolabial angle112.0 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle137.4 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle132.9 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

8.3
Nasofacial angle34.9 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation36.9 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

0.0
Mid nose projection-1.1 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle51.3 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

2.8

Lips

10.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-3.3 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-1.5 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)0.5 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

9.9
Lower lip (S-line)0.7 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

9.9
Upper lip (E-line)3.4 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)2.4 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line0.4 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

8.8 / 10

Mentolabial angle143.3 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

2.8
Recession relative to Frankfort4.7 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle121.1 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle15.0 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Ramus to mandible ratio0.67

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line17.3 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

7.2 / 10

Submental cervical angle110.9 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

7.2

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal midface compactness

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious midface due to cheekbone width and midface height sitting in classical proportion.

Face width to height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal midface ratio

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious midface due to eye spacing and midface length sitting in proportion.

Midface ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal canthal tilt

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the outer corners sitting gently above the inner corners.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.30

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Thin lips

-0.26

The lips are shallow for the width of the mouth, which reads as a thin mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

severeSide view

Deep-set nasal root

-0.24

The transition from forehead to nose is sharp, which can read as a heavy brow or deep root.

Nasofrontal angle (side view)

severeFront view

Wide forehead

-0.23

The temples are wide against the cheekbones, which makes the upper face read heavy.

Bitemporal width (front view)

severeSide view

Deep face for its height

-0.23

The face carries far back for its height, which can read heavy in profile.

Facial depth to height (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.