Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Elijah Wood - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - The Lord of the Rings, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Sin City

Elijah Wood's midface is the strong part: temple and cheek width in step, a straight well-set nose in profile, lips right on the line and a jaw that runs at a clean angle to a well-placed chin. Where it gives is around that, with a tall forehead over a narrow face, big round eyes rather than long ones, ears that carry off the head, an upturned nose tip and a thin upper lip against the lower.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Caucasian
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
6.6 / 10
Elijah Wood front portrait
Elijah Wood side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Elijah Wood's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.2

out of 10

Top 25%

Side view

7.4

out of 10

Top 2%

Best looking out of 8 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.2/ 10 harmony
Elijah Wood front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

8.3 / 10

Top third34.07%

Ideal 30 to 32

5.5
Middle third30.76%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

9.5
Lower third35.17%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

8.0 / 10

Face width to height1.81

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width85.55%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Midface ratio0.99

Ideal 0.97 to 1

10.0
10.0
Cheekbone height91.14%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

7.9 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt3.4 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

1.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.77

Ideal 0 to 0.45

7.5
Eye aspect ratio2.87

Ideal 3 to 3.5

8.6
Eye separation ratio47.17%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

9.8
One eye apart test1.15

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

8.9
Eyebrow tilt6.5 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

9.9
Brow length to face width0.66

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

9.3

Nose

6.2 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle89.3 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA8.5 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

1.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.38

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.09

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

10.0
Nose tip position1.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

5.1 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.7 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

5.9
Chin to philtrum ratio1.88

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.86

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.9
Lip fullness0.32

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.70

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

0.0
Mouth to nose width1.24

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

0.0
Mouth corner position0.8 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

0.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio13.76%

Ideal 8 to 12

0.0
Ear protrusion angle17.4 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

6.3 / 10

Jaw slope136.2 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

5.3
Bigonial width89.95%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

10.0
Lower third proportion34.82%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle97.8 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

6.1
Neck width93.17%

Ideal 92 to 98

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.4/ 10 harmony
Elijah Wood side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.7 / 10

Browridge inclination16.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle127.4 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

10.0
Upper forehead slope6.3 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

0.1

Profile convexity

7.3 / 10

Z angle77.2 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

9.8
Total facial convexity139.0 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

9.7
Orbital vector-3.1 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)164.9 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

0.0
Anterior facial depth66.3 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)162.4 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

9.8
Facial depth to height1.49

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

9.5
Interior midface projection54.3 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

7.0 / 10

Nasal width to height0.76

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.76

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

3.5
Nasolabial angle123.2 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

0.0
Nasal tip angle134.5 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle126.1 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle33.9 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation26.6 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

1.3
Mid nose projection1.0 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

7.8
Frankfort tip angle36.6 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

10.0

Lips

6.6 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-1.0 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

6.2
Lower lip (Burstone)-0.4 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.8
Upper lip (S-line)3.0 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)2.3 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)6.0 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

9.9
Lower lip (E-line)4.3 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line0.3 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

8.8 / 10

Mentolabial angle131.2 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

9.0
Recession relative to Frankfort-3.7 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

5.0
Gonial angle114.6 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

9.9
Mandibular plane angle15.2 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.59

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.1
Gonion to mouth line18.8 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle119.1 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal alar angle

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base sitting in classical relation to the eye corners.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose proportions

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to its projection and height sitting in classical proportion.

Nasal width to height (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal lip fullness

10.0

This contributes to attractive lips due to the lip height sitting in proportion with the width of the mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal midface projection

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the nose base carrying classically forward of the ear.

Anterior facial depth (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.36

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.33

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Flared nose base

-0.26

The nose base is wide relative to the bridge, which can make the nostrils read flared.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow mouth for the nose

-0.25

The mouth is barely wider than the nose base, which can make the nose read wide.

Mouth to nose width (front view)

severeFront view

Low-set mouth

-0.23

The mouth sits low in the lower third, which shortens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Elijah Wood's strongest and weakest features

Elijah Wood scores 6.62 overall, and his profile outscores his front: 7.38 side against 6.15 front. His nose in profile and his jaw are his strongest features, and his costs come from the ears, the midface and the mouth width.

From the front, his lower third and midface ratio are in band, his full face is ideally proportioned for its width, and his cheekbones sit high. The angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners is ideal, his nose is sized correctly to the space between his eyes, and its tip sits level with his nostrils. His lips are full and his mouth corners sit well. His bigonial width and neck width are ideal. In profile, his brow ridge, the step from his brow to his nose and his facial depth are in band, his nose length, nose angles and the incline of the underside of his nose are ideal, his midface carries his nose base forward correctly, his lips sit on the Holdaway line with his lower lip on the E-line, and his jaw plane and jaw corner height are ideal.

His largest cost is ear protrusion: his ears are angled out at 17.4 degrees where 10 to 11.5 is ideal, which is his weakest single metric at 1.98 out of 10. His midface reads long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.81 against 1.96 to 2. His nose bridge reads narrow against the width of his nostrils, at 2.38 against 2.06 to 2.14. His mouth is narrow, at 1.24 nose widths against 1.42 to 1.5 and 0.70 of his pupil distance against 0.83 to 0.87, and his upper lip is long, taking up 34.8% of the lower third against 31 to 33.5%.