Celebrity analysis

How attractive is David Tennant - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Doctor Who, Broadchurch, Good Omens

David Tennant is built on the jaw, with a well-angled corner on a long ramus, wide cheekbones and temples, even thirds, eyes spaced one apart and a chin that sits forward where it should. The nose and mouth take it back, with a narrow bridge carrying a hump into an upturned tip, thin lips pushed well past the profile line, ears that swing wide and a jaw that eases into the neck.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Scottish
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
5.6 / 10
David Tennant front portrait
David Tennant side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

David Tennant's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

5.8

out of 10

Top 35%

Side view

5.2

out of 10

Top 48%

Best looking out of 2 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.8/ 10 harmony
David Tennant front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.7 / 10

Top third31.94%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third34.11%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

9.2
Lower third33.95%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

7.0 / 10

Face width to height1.82

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width90.13%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio1.01

Ideal 0.97 to 1

9.9
4.8
Cheekbone height85.28%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

6.2 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt4.0 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

4.3
Eyebrow low setedness0.91

Ideal 0 to 0.45

4.9
Eye aspect ratio2.60

Ideal 3 to 3.5

0.0
Eye separation ratio46.21%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

10.0
One eye apart test1.06

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

10.0
Eyebrow tilt3.9 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

5.9
Brow length to face width0.64

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

8.2

Nose

5.4 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle85.8 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.8
Deviation of IAA and JFA9.7 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.74

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.24

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

7.3
Nose tip position2.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

6.5 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.9 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

7.8
Chin to philtrum ratio2.33

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio2.51

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

0.0
Lip fullness0.22

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

0.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.85

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

10.0
Mouth to nose width1.43

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

10.0
Mouth corner position-0.8 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

7.6

Ears

5.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.92%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle19.4 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.3 / 10

Jaw slope141.2 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

10.0
Bigonial width86.81%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

9.9
Lower third proportion29.76%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle95.5 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

8.9
Neck width87.93%

Ideal 92 to 98

7.6

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.2/ 10 harmony
David Tennant side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

8.3 / 10

Browridge inclination23.2 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Nasofrontal angle132.9 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

6.0
Upper forehead slope3.4 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

8.9

Profile convexity

6.0 / 10

Z angle88.7 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

0.0
Total facial convexity141.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-2.3 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

1.3
Facial convexity (glabella)171.2 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth68.4 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.9
Facial convexity (nasion)168.2 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

7.3
Facial depth to height1.61

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

2.2
Interior midface projection62.3 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

7.4

Nose

5.6 / 10

Nasal width to height0.78

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.76

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

3.4
Nasolabial angle122.3 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

0.0
Nasal tip angle130.1 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle129.8 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle31.4 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation34.7 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.0
Mid nose projection2.5 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

0.0
Frankfort tip angle42.5 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

7.0

Lips

3.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)1.2 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

0.0
Lower lip (Burstone)0.8 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

4.9
Upper lip (S-line)5.8 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)3.9 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)9.1 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

0.0
Lower lip (E-line)6.3 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

6.2
Holdaway H line-0.1 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

9.6 / 10

Mentolabial angle127.5 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

9.9
Recession relative to Frankfort9.2 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle122.9 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

9.1
Mandibular plane angle11.2 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

8.5
Ramus to mandible ratio0.77

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.9
Gonion to mouth line26.8 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle130.5 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal jaw corner

10.0

This contributes to a defined lower face due to the jaw turning at a classical angle.

Jaw slope (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eye spacing

10.0

This contributes to a balanced midface due to the eyes sitting neither too close together nor too far apart.

Eye separation ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal mouth width

10.0

This contributes to lower-face harmony due to the mouth sizing classically against the eyes.

Interpupillary to mouth width (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal chin position

10.0

This contributes to a strong profile due to the chin sitting classically on the nasion perpendicular.

Recession relative to Frankfort (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal chin-philtrum balance

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to chin height and philtrum length sitting in classical proportion.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal forehead width

10.0

This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.

Bitemporal width (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Flared nose base

-0.41

The nose base is wide relative to the bridge, which can make the nostrils read flared.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.40

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

Thin lips

-0.35

The lips are shallow for the width of the mouth, which reads as a thin mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.33

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Heavy lower lip

-0.28

The lower lip is much fuller than the upper, which can unbalance the mouth.

Lower to upper lip ratio (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

David Tennant's strongest and weakest features

David Tennant scores 5.55 overall, with a close front and side (5.78 and 5.19). His eye spacing, mouth width and jaw are his strongest features, and his costs come from the nose bridge, the ears, the lips and an upturned nose.

From the front, his upper and lower thirds and his temples are in band, and his cheekbones sit high. His eyes sit correctly across the face and are spaced correctly for their length. His nose tip sits level with his nostrils and his chin is in proportion to his philtrum. His mouth is the right width for both his nose and his pupil distance, and his jaw slope is ideal. In profile, his facial convexity is in band, his nose length and nose angles are ideal, his lips sit on the Holdaway line, his chin sits at the right depth, and his jaw corner height is ideal.

His largest cost is his nose bridge, which reads narrow against the width of his nostrils, at 2.74 where 2.06 to 2.14 is ideal, which is his weakest single metric at 1.09 out of 10. His ears are angled out at 19.4 degrees against 10 to 11.5. His lips are thin, at 0.22 against 0.297 to 0.363, and his upper lip is thin against his lower, at a ratio of 2.51 against 1.55 to 1.85. His midface reads long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.82 against 1.96 to 2. In profile, his nose tip is rotated upward at 34.7 degrees against 11.5 to 21.5.