Celebrity analysis

How attractive is David Gandy - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model - Dolce & Gabbana Light Blue, Marks & Spencer, Vogue

David Gandy is built around the eyes and the jaw: an upturned outer eye corner, a wide jaw that keeps a clean corner and a straight line from cheekbone to gonion under a flat forehead. The lower face gives it back, with a thin upper lip set well behind the profile line and a long nose whose tip drops and pushes the whole profile forward.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
English
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
8.2 / 10
David Gandy front portrait
David Gandy side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

David Gandy's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

8.1

out of 10

Top 0.08%

Side view

8.2

out of 10

Top 0.05%

Best looking out of 2,000 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.1/ 10 harmony
David Gandy front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third30.18%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third33.16%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third36.66%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

7.8 / 10

Face width to height1.75

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width85.25%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.8
Midface ratio0.94

Ideal 0.97 to 1

9.3
10.0
Cheekbone height90.47%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

9.4 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt7.6 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.70

Ideal 0 to 0.45

8.5
Eye aspect ratio2.95

Ideal 3 to 3.5

9.9
Eye separation ratio47.31%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

9.6
One eye apart test0.97

Ideal 0.95 to 1

10.0
Eyebrow tilt6.2 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

9.9
Brow length to face width0.64

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

8.0

Nose

7.6 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle82.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA2.5 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

9.9
Nose bridge to nose width2.17

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

9.7
Intercanthal to nasal width1.22

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

8.5
Nose tip position2.4 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

8.3 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.2 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

9.9
Chin to philtrum ratio2.07

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

9.2
Lower to upper lip ratio2.75

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

0.0
Lip fullness0.29

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

9.4
Interpupillary to mouth width0.82

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

9.9
Mouth to nose width1.39

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

9.7
Mouth corner position2.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

3.2 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio12.92%

Ideal 8 to 12

6.4
Ear protrusion angle14.8 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

9.6 / 10

Jaw slope144.3 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

8.9
Bigonial width88.06%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

10.0
Lower third proportion31.25%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle84.6 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.3
Neck width96.30%

Ideal 92 to 98

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.2/ 10 harmony
David Gandy side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

9.9 / 10

Browridge inclination24.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.6
Nasofrontal angle121.3 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

10.0
Upper forehead slope0.6 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

10.0

Profile convexity

8.6 / 10

Z angle84.9 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

7.3
Total facial convexity138.6 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

9.3
Orbital vector-1.6 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

4.2
Facial convexity (glabella)170.9 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth67.2 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)166.0 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

9.9
Facial depth to height1.53

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

7.8
Interior midface projection60.0 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

8.0 / 10

Nasal width to height0.76

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.72

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

7.3
Nasolabial angle96.4 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

9.9
Nasal tip angle137.9 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle125.1 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.4
Nasofacial angle34.2 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation16.7 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

10.0
Mid nose projection1.8 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

0.0
Frankfort tip angle28.7 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

5.8

Lips

4.2 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-1.6 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

9.8
Lower lip (Burstone)0.5 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

6.4
Upper lip (S-line)4.2 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)4.1 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)8.8 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

0.0
Lower lip (E-line)6.9 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

3.5
Holdaway H line1.5 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

9.5

Chin and jaw

10.0 / 10

Mentolabial angle118.0 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort8.0 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle116.6 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle16.0 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.61

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.9
Gonion to mouth line20.1 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

6.7 / 10

Submental cervical angle112.0 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

6.7

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal face shape

10.0

This contributes to overall harmony due to face length and width sitting in balanced proportion.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal canthal tilt

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the outer corners sitting gently above the inner corners.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.38

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Heavy lower lip

-0.29

The lower lip is much fuller than the upper, which can unbalance the mouth.

Lower to upper lip ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.22

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow alar angle

-0.18

The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

severeSide view

Protrusive lower lip

-0.12

The lower lip leads the S-line, which can read forward.

Lower lip (S-line) (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.