Celebrity analysis

How attractive is David Gandy - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model - Dolce & Gabbana Light Blue, Marks & Spencer, Vogue

David Gandy is built around the eyes and the jaw: an upturned outer eye corner, a wide jaw that keeps a clean corner and a straight line from cheekbone to gonion under a flat forehead. The lower face gives it back, with a thin upper lip set well behind the profile line and a long nose whose tip drops and pushes the whole profile forward.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
English
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
8.1 / 10
David Gandy front portrait
David Gandy side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

David Gandy's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.9

out of 10

Top 0.2%

Side view

8.3

out of 10

Top 0.04%

Best looking out of 800 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.9/ 10 harmony
David Gandy front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third30.23%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third33.34%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third36.43%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

7.7 / 10

Face width to height1.75

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width84.09%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

8.8
Midface ratio0.94

Ideal 0.97 to 1

9.5
10.0
Cheekbone height90.46%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.8 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt7.6 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.71

Ideal 0 to 0.45

8.5
Eye aspect ratio2.79

Ideal 3 to 3.5

6.1
Eye separation ratio47.48%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

9.2
One eye apart test1.08

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

10.0
Eyebrow tilt6.0 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

9.9
Brow length to face width0.64

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

7.8

Nose

5.7 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle82.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA5.7 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

7.1
Nose bridge to nose width2.29

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

2.2
Intercanthal to nasal width1.20

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

9.2
Nose tip position1.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

8.1 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.2 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

9.9
Chin to philtrum ratio2.06

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

8.9
Lower to upper lip ratio2.20

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

3.2
Lip fullness0.27

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

4.5
Interpupillary to mouth width0.84

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

10.0
Mouth to nose width1.45

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

10.0
Mouth corner position3.4 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

3.4 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio12.87%

Ideal 8 to 12

6.9
Ear protrusion angle14.9 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

10.0 / 10

Jaw slope142.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

9.9
Bigonial width86.79%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

9.9
Lower third proportion32.37%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle87.8 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width97.51%

Ideal 92 to 98

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.3/ 10 harmony
David Gandy side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

9.8 / 10

Browridge inclination24.3 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.5
Nasofrontal angle121.3 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

10.0
Upper forehead slope1.1 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

10.0

Profile convexity

8.6 / 10

Z angle84.9 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

7.3
Total facial convexity138.6 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

9.3
Orbital vector-1.6 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

4.2
Facial convexity (glabella)170.9 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth67.2 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)166.0 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

9.9
Facial depth to height1.53

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

7.8
Interior midface projection60.0 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

8.0 / 10

Nasal width to height0.76

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.72

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

7.3
Nasolabial angle96.4 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

9.9
Nasal tip angle137.9 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle125.1 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.4
Nasofacial angle34.2 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation16.7 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

10.0
Mid nose projection1.8 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

0.0
Frankfort tip angle28.7 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

5.8

Lips

4.2 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-1.6 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

9.8
Lower lip (Burstone)0.5 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

6.4
Upper lip (S-line)4.2 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)4.1 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)8.7 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

0.0
Lower lip (E-line)6.8 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

3.6
Holdaway H line1.5 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

9.5

Chin and jaw

10.0 / 10

Mentolabial angle118.0 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort7.9 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle116.6 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle16.0 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.61

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.9
Gonion to mouth line19.3 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

6.7 / 10

Submental cervical angle112.0 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

6.7

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal nose tip rotation

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip being gently rotated without exposing the nostrils.

Nose tip rotation (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal chin position

10.0

This contributes to a strong profile due to the chin sitting classically on the nasion perpendicular.

Recession relative to Frankfort (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal forehead contour

10.0

This contributes to a pleasant profile due to the forehead curving gently between brow and hairline.

Upper forehead slope (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower-third balance

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth sitting a classical third of the way from nose to chin.

Lower third proportion (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose proportions

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to its projection and height sitting in classical proportion.

Nasal width to height (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nasofrontal angle

10.0

This contributes to a refined profile due to the forehead flowing into the nose at a classical angle.

Nasofrontal angle (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.39

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.23

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow alar angle

-0.18

The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

severeFront view

Flared nose base

-0.13

The nose base is wide relative to the bridge, which can make the nostrils read flared.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

severeSide view

Recessed lower lip

-0.12

The lower lip falls behind the S-line, which can read flat.

Lower lip (S-line) (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

David Gandy's strongest and weakest features

David Gandy scores 8.05 overall, with an even front and side (7.93 and 8.25). His facial proportions, jaw and profile are his strongest features, and his costs are mostly mild.

From the front, all three facial thirds are in band, his full face is ideally proportioned for its width, and his cheekbones sit high. His outer eye corners tilt correctly and his eyes are spaced correctly for their length. His mouth is the right width for both his nose and his pupil distance, and his mouth corners sit well. The split of his lower third between lip and chin, the angle where the two sides of his jaw meet, and his neck width are all ideal. In profile, the step from his brow to his nose, his forehead slope, facial convexity and facial depth are in band, his nose angles and tip rotation are ideal, his midface carries his nose base forward correctly, his chin sits at the right depth, and his mentolabial angle, jaw corner angle, jaw plane and jaw corner height are all ideal.

His largest cost is that his midface reads long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.75 where 1.96 to 2 is ideal, which takes about 0.39 of a point. His ears are angled out at 14.9 degrees against 10 to 11.5, and the angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners is slightly narrow, at 82.1 degrees against 86.5 to 92.5. His nose bridge reads slightly narrow against the width of his nostrils, at 2.29 against 2.06 to 2.14, and his lower lip is full relative to his upper, at 2.20 against 1.55 to 1.85. In profile, his lower lip sits 4.1mm ahead of the S-line against -0.4 to 1.4mm, which is his weakest single metric at 1.46 out of 10.