Celebrity analysis

How attractive is David Beckham - Facial Harmony Analysis

Footballer - Manchester United, Real Madrid, England captain

David Beckham's midface carries it, with high cheekbones holding the eyes forward, an even forehead-to-jaw stack, a well-set nose and real lift at the mouth corners over a square jaw front-on. The mouth and the profile give ground, with a thin upper lip under a much fuller lower one, eyes on almost no tilt, a tip rotated up, no crease under the lip and no clean line from jaw into neck.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
British
Eyes:
Green
Harmony:
6.6 / 10
David Beckham front portrait
David Beckham side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

David Beckham's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.2

out of 10

Top 25%

Side view

7.3

out of 10

Top 2.7%

Best looking out of 7 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.2/ 10 harmony
David Beckham front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third31.47%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third33.66%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

9.9
Lower third34.87%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

5.3 / 10

Face width to height1.84

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width93.11%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Midface ratio0.90

Ideal 0.97 to 1

5.6
0.8
Cheekbone height90.63%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

7.1 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt1.8 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

0.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.52

Ideal 0 to 0.45

9.9
Eye aspect ratio3.51

Ideal 3 to 3.5

9.9
Eye separation ratio44.33%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

7.5
One eye apart test1.12

Ideal 0.95 to 1

2.4
Eyebrow tilt7.7 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

10.0
Brow length to face width0.69

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

9.9

Nose

4.6 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle78.8 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA10.5 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.28

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

3.1
Intercanthal to nasal width1.07

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

10.0
Nose tip position2.6 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

6.5 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.7 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

5.3
Chin to philtrum ratio2.22

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio3.00

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

0.0
Lip fullness0.23

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

0.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.86

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

10.0
Mouth to nose width1.51

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

9.9
Mouth corner position3.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio7.70%

Ideal 8 to 12

9.9
Ear protrusion angle9.8 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

9.9

Jaw, neck and lower face

6.0 / 10

Jaw slope147.4 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

1.3
Bigonial width85.42%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

8.7
Lower third proportion29.90%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle89.3 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width97.60%

Ideal 92 to 98

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.3/ 10 harmony
David Beckham side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

7.9 / 10

Browridge inclination12.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

3.6
Nasofrontal angle124.8 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

10.0
Upper forehead slope0.4 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

10.0

Profile convexity

8.1 / 10

Z angle79.6 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

10.0
Total facial convexity150.2 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

9.1
Orbital vector2.0 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

10.0
Facial convexity (glabella)172.7 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth71.3 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

6.8
Facial convexity (nasion)167.5 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

8.8
Facial depth to height1.39

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection66.4 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

0.0

Nose

7.2 / 10

Nasal width to height0.71

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.74

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

5.4
Nasolabial angle109.8 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle142.7 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

4.3
Nasomental angle135.0 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

8.1
Nasofacial angle30.2 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

9.7
Nose tip rotation30.7 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.0
Mid nose projection-0.0 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle42.3 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

7.2

Lips

8.2 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.5 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-0.5 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.8
Upper lip (S-line)1.9 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

8.5
Lower lip (S-line)2.7 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)5.2 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)5.2 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

9.5
Holdaway H line1.4 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

9.9

Chin and jaw

8.1 / 10

Mentolabial angle146.6 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort-1.2 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

8.7
Gonial angle114.3 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

9.8
Mandibular plane angle20.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.61

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.8
Gonion to mouth line17.0 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle122.3 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eyebrow tilt

10.0

This contributes to a lively eye area due to the brows rising gently toward their peaks.

Eyebrow tilt (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose width

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base spanning just over the space between the eyes, per the classical guideline.

Intercanthal to nasal width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose tip height

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip riding slightly above the nostril line.

Nose tip position (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Heavy lower lip

-0.37

The lower lip is much fuller than the upper, which can unbalance the mouth.

Lower to upper lip ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow alar angle

-0.32

The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

severeFront view

Thin lips

-0.32

The lips are shallow for the width of the mouth, which reads as a thin mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

severeFront view

Negative canthal tilt

-0.28

The outer eye corners sit low, which can read as tired or downturned eyes.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.28

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.