Celebrity analysis
How attractive is David Beckham - Facial Harmony Analysis
Footballer - Manchester United, Real Madrid, England captain
David Beckham's midface carries it, with high cheekbones holding the eyes forward, an even forehead-to-jaw stack, a well-set nose and real lift at the mouth corners over a square jaw front-on. The mouth and the profile give ground, with a thin upper lip under a much fuller lower one, eyes on almost no tilt, a tip rotated up, no crease under the lip and no clean line from jaw into neck.
- Gender:
- Male
- Ethnicity:
- British
- Eyes:
- Green
- Harmony:
- 6.5 / 10
Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.
Signature tool
See my closest celebrity match
Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.
Harmony report
David Beckham's facial harmony
Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.
Overall harmony
6.5
out of 10
Top 15%
Front view
6.0
out of 10
Top 28%
Side view
7.3
out of 10
Top 2.7%
Best looking out of 7 people
Front harmony
Front analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Facial thirds
10.0 / 10
Face shape
5.3 / 10
Eyes and brows
6.8 / 10
Nose
4.6 / 10
Mouth and lips
6.5 / 10
Ears
10.0 / 10
Jaw, neck and lower face
6.0 / 10
Side harmony
Side analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Forehead and brow
7.9 / 10
Profile convexity
8.1 / 10
Nose
7.2 / 10
Lips
8.2 / 10
Chin and jaw
8.1 / 10
Neck
0.0 / 10
Biggest strengths
These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.
Ideal lower face taper
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jawlines tapering at a classical angle.
Jaw frontal angle (front view)
Ideal profile convexity
10.0This contributes to a balanced profile due to brow, nose base, and chin falling in a gently convex line.
Facial convexity (glabella) (side view)
Ideal cheekbone height
10.0This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.
Cheekbone height (front view)
Ideal profile line
10.0This contributes to a balanced profile due to the chin and lips falling on a classical line.
Z angle (side view)
Ideal depth-to-height balance
10.0This contributes to a balanced head shape due to facial depth sitting in classical proportion to face height.
Facial depth to height (side view)
Ideal lower third
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.
Lower third (front view)
Areas to improve
5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.
Heavy lower lip
-0.38The lower lip is much fuller than the upper, which can unbalance the mouth.
Lower to upper lip ratio (front view)
Narrow alar angle
-0.32The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.
Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)
Thin lips
-0.32The lips are shallow for the width of the mouth, which reads as a thin mouth.
Lip fullness (front view)
Negative canthal tilt
-0.28The outer eye corners sit low, which can read as tired or downturned eyes.
Lateral canthal tilt (front view)
Narrow midface
-0.28The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.
Face width to height (front view)
Celebrity lookalikes
Both profilesLoading the celebrity library...
Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.
David Beckham's strongest and weakest features
David Beckham scores 6.51 overall, and his profile outscores his front: 7.27 side against 6.05 front. His profile and jaw are his strongest features, and his costs come from the lips, the angle of the nose base and the eye tilt.
From the front, his upper and lower thirds are in band and his cheekbones sit high. His brows are tilted correctly, and his nose is sized correctly to the space between his eyes. His chin is in proportion to his philtrum, his mouth is the right width for his pupil distance, and his mouth corners sit well. The angle where the two sides of his jaw meet and his neck width are ideal. In profile, the step from his brow to his nose, his forehead slope, Z angle, orbital vector, facial convexity and facial depth are in band, his nose angle to the lip and bridge line are ideal, his upper lip sits on the Burstone and E-line references, and his jaw plane and jaw corner height are ideal.
His largest cost is his lips: his upper lip is thin against his lower, at a ratio of 3.00 where 1.55 to 1.85 is ideal, which takes about 0.38 of a point, and his lips are thin overall, at 0.23 against 0.297 to 0.363. The angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners is narrow, at 78.8 degrees against 86.5 to 92.5, and it differs from his jaw angle by 10.5 degrees against 2.5 or less. His outer eye corners tilt up only 1.8 degrees where 6 to 7.7 is ideal, and his midface reads slightly long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.84 against 1.96 to 2.