Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Chris Pratt - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Guardians of the Galaxy, Parks and Recreation, Jurassic World

Chris Pratt has a square jaw with a clean line into the neck, a chin that carries well forward, high cheekbones holding the eyes up and ears flat to the head. The upper face and the mouth are where it gives, with a tall sloped forehead over a short midface, flat brows, thin lips pushed well ahead of the profile and no crease under the lower one.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Caucasian
Eyes:
Green
Harmony:
5.9 / 10
Chris Pratt front portrait
Chris Pratt side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Chris Pratt's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.3

out of 10

Top 20%

Side view

5.1

out of 10

Top 49%

Best looking out of 3 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.3/ 10 harmony
Chris Pratt front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

6.5 / 10

Top third34.15%

Ideal 30 to 32

5.1
Middle third29.49%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

4.2
Lower third36.36%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

5.9 / 10

Face width to height1.79

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width86.23%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Midface ratio0.94

Ideal 0.97 to 1

9.4
0.0
Cheekbone height88.89%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

5.8 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt4.3 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

5.8
Eyebrow low setedness0.80

Ideal 0 to 0.45

7.0
Eye aspect ratio2.94

Ideal 3 to 3.5

9.8
Eye separation ratio44.83%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

9.1
One eye apart test1.25

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

1.4
Eyebrow tilt1.8 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

0.0
Brow length to face width0.63

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

7.3

Nose

8.1 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle84.2 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

6.5
Deviation of IAA and JFA7.1 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

4.2
Nose bridge to nose width2.15

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

9.9
Intercanthal to nasal width1.11

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

10.0
Nose tip position0.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

6.4 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.6 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

4.1
Chin to philtrum ratio2.43

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio2.27

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

0.7
Lip fullness0.23

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

0.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.82

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

9.9
Mouth to nose width1.42

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

9.9
Mouth corner position1.4 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

9.1 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio9.45%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle12.5 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

8.2

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.5 / 10

Jaw slope137.6 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

8.2
Bigonial width91.66%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

9.9
Lower third proportion29.41%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle91.3 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width89.73%

Ideal 92 to 98

9.4

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.1/ 10 harmony
Chris Pratt side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

4.8 / 10

Browridge inclination22.8 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Nasofrontal angle133.8 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

4.5
Upper forehead slope10.2 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

0.0

Profile convexity

6.1 / 10

Z angle86.8 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

3.1
Total facial convexity151.9 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

7.6
Orbital vector2.7 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

10.0
Facial convexity (glabella)178.4 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

3.2
Anterior facial depth65.7 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)175.1 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

0.0
Facial depth to height1.57

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

5.2
Interior midface projection59.8 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

5.5 / 10

Nasal width to height0.76

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.78

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

0.2
Nasolabial angle106.8 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle129.8 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle139.6 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

1.6
Nasofacial angle27.7 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

4.6
Nose tip rotation28.8 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.0
Mid nose projection-1.3 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

9.9
Frankfort tip angle44.9 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

3.2

Lips

4.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-0.6 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

2.8
Lower lip (Burstone)-0.8 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.9
Upper lip (S-line)4.8 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)3.3 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)9.0 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

0.0
Lower lip (E-line)6.5 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

5.3
Holdaway H line-0.3 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

9.9

Chin and jaw

7.8 / 10

Mentolabial angle155.4 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort13.2 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle119.4 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle14.2 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Ramus to mandible ratio0.85

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

7.0
Gonion to mouth line42.2 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle102.3 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal nose width

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base spanning just over the space between the eyes, per the classical guideline.

Intercanthal to nasal width (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose proportions

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to its projection and height sitting in classical proportion.

Nasal width to height (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nasolabial angle

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose-lip transition due to the angle under the nose sitting in its classical range.

Nasolabial angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal midface projection

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the nose base carrying classically forward of the ear.

Anterior facial depth (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal ear set

10.0

This contributes to a clean facial outline due to the ears sitting close to the head.

Ear protrusion ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Long, narrow face shape

-0.38

The face is long for its width, which can read stretched.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.37

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Thin lips

-0.31

The lips are shallow for the width of the mouth, which reads as a thin mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.27

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeSide view

Effaced chin crease

-0.25

The crease between lip and chin is flat, which softens chin definition.

Mentolabial angle (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Chris Pratt's strongest and weakest features

Chris Pratt scores 5.88 overall, and his front outscores his profile: 6.33 front against 5.14 side. His jaw corner, neck line and nose are his strongest features, and his costs come from the length of the face, the lips and the flatness of the profile.

His lower third is in band, his cheekbones sit high, and his nose is sized correctly to the space between his eyes. His chin is proportioned to his philtrum, his mouth corners sit well, and his ears sit flat. The angle where the two sides of his jaw meet is ideal. In profile, his orbital vector and facial depth are in band, his nasolabial angle and nose tip angle are ideal, and his chin sits at the right depth. His jaw corner angle, jaw corner height and submental angle are all ideal, so his jaw cuts a clean line into the neck.

His largest cost is that his face reads long for its width, at a height to cheekbone width ratio of 1.45 where 1.34 to 1.37 is ideal, which takes about 0.38 of a point. His midface also reads long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.79 against 1.96 to 2. His lips are thin, at 0.23 against 0.297 to 0.363, and his upper lip is short, taking up only 29.4% of the lower third against 31 to 33.5%, so the chin portion runs long. In profile, the fold between his lower lip and chin is shallow, at 155.4 degrees against 111 to 127, and the profile through the top of the nose is flatter than ideal, at 175.1 degrees against 163 to 166.