Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Chico Lachowski - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model - Dior, Armani and Dolce & Gabbana campaigns

Chico Lachowski stacks three even thirds, with high cheekbones, a well-cut nose and a chin proportioned to the upper lip. The eye area and jaw undercut it, with no upward tilt, narrow eyes, high-set brows and a jaw that reads narrow with an open corner.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Brazilian
Eyes:
Green
Harmony:
7.4 / 10
Chico Lachowski front portrait
Chico Lachowski side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Chico Lachowski's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.2

out of 10

Top 3.3%

Side view

7.6

out of 10

Top 0.8%

Best looking out of 50 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.2/ 10 harmony
Chico Lachowski front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third31.55%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third32.62%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third35.83%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

6.0 / 10

Face width to height1.93

Ideal 1.96 to 2

9.1
Bitemporal width80.77%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

2.9
Midface ratio1.06

Ideal 0.97 to 1

7.9
0.0
Cheekbone height94.37%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

5.1 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt2.7 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

0.0
Eyebrow low setedness1.53

Ideal 0 to 0.45

0.0
Eye aspect ratio3.77

Ideal 3 to 3.5

3.7
Eye separation ratio44.78%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

8.9
One eye apart test1.12

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

9.9
Eyebrow tilt4.7 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

8.1
Brow length to face width0.62

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

5.2

Nose

8.1 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle91.2 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA7.3 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

3.6
Nose bridge to nose width2.23

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

6.9
Intercanthal to nasal width1.12

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

10.0
Nose tip position0.7 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

8.9 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.6 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

4.4
Chin to philtrum ratio2.38

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.62

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.34

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.80

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

9.3
Mouth to nose width1.42

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

10.0
Mouth corner position-0.6 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

8.5

Ears

5.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.91%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle15.1 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

6.7 / 10

Jaw slope142.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

10.0
Bigonial width80.22%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

0.0
Lower third proportion31.83%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle98.6 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

4.9
Neck width99.77%

Ideal 92 to 98

8.8

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.6/ 10 harmony
Chico Lachowski side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

5.8 / 10

Browridge inclination22.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Nasofrontal angle139.3 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

0.0
Upper forehead slope4.0 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

7.5

Profile convexity

7.5 / 10

Z angle82.9 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

9.8
Total facial convexity148.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

9.8
Orbital vector0.3 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

9.6
Facial convexity (glabella)172.8 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth70.7 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

7.7
Facial convexity (nasion)169.8 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

2.5
Facial depth to height1.40

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection64.8 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

0.3

Nose

7.4 / 10

Nasal width to height0.64

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

9.9
Nasal projection0.66

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

10.0
Nasolabial angle103.8 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle139.3 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

9.8
Nasomental angle135.6 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

7.4
Nasofacial angle29.6 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

9.0
Nose tip rotation37.3 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.0
Mid nose projection-1.3 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

9.9
Frankfort tip angle50.9 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

0.0

Lips

10.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-4.8 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.8 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)0.2 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)0.2 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

10.0
Upper lip (E-line)3.8 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)2.4 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line0.1 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

8.3 / 10

Mentolabial angle140.6 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort8.1 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle115.3 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle16.3 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.64

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line23.9 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

9.7 / 10

Submental cervical angle91.0 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

9.7

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal chin position

10.0

This contributes to a strong profile due to the chin sitting classically on the nasion perpendicular.

Recession relative to Frankfort (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal profile convexity

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to brow, nose base, and chin falling in a gently convex line.

Facial convexity (glabella) (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal upper lip position (E-line)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the upper lip sitting classically just behind Ricketts' E-line.

Upper lip (E-line) (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal lip fullness

10.0

This contributes to attractive lips due to the lip height sitting in proportion with the width of the mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nasolabial angle

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose-lip transition due to the angle under the nose sitting in its classical range.

Nasolabial angle (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

High-set brows

-0.27

The brows sit high above the eyes, which can read surprised and soften eye-area definition.

Eyebrow low setedness (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.26

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeSide view

Over-rotated nose tip

-0.25

The nostril axis points high, which can expose the nostrils.

Nose tip rotation (side view)

severeFront view

Narrow jaw

-0.22

The jaw is narrow against the cheekbones, which tapers the lower face strongly.

Bigonial width (front view)

severeFront view

Negative canthal tilt

-0.21

The outer eye corners sit low, which can read as tired or downturned eyes.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.