Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Charlie Puth - Facial Harmony Analysis

Singer - Attention, See You Again, Light Switch

Charlie Puth is carried by the midface, with an even thirds stack, high cheekbones, long almond eyes, a mouth cut to the width of the nose and a straight profile line. The lower face and the ears cost him, with ears that swing wide, a long chin under a short upper lip, a nose that projects hard, a shallow chin crease and no line from jaw into neck.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Jewish-Italian American
Eyes:
Hazel
Harmony:
6.1 / 10
Charlie Puth front portrait
Charlie Puth side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Charlie Puth's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.2

out of 10

Top 22%

Side view

5.8

out of 10

Top 34%

Best looking out of 4 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.2/ 10 harmony
Charlie Puth front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third32.12%

Ideal 30 to 32

9.9
Middle third32.44%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third35.44%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

9.7 / 10

Face width to height1.93

Ideal 1.96 to 2

8.9
Bitemporal width85.38%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.8
Midface ratio0.99

Ideal 0.97 to 1

10.0
10.0
Cheekbone height89.55%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

7.3 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt3.9 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

3.9
Eyebrow low setedness0.82

Ideal 0 to 0.45

6.6
Eye aspect ratio3.07

Ideal 3 to 3.5

10.0
Eye separation ratio43.84%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

5.2
One eye apart test1.06

Ideal 0.95 to 1

8.3
Eyebrow tilt4.8 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

8.3
Brow length to face width0.65

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

9.0

Nose

6.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle82.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

1.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA12.3 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.05

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

9.9
Intercanthal to nasal width1.19

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

9.7
Nose tip position3.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

9.5

Mouth and lips

6.7 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.8 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

7.1
Chin to philtrum ratio3.32

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.38

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

8.7
Lip fullness0.28

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

8.5
Interpupillary to mouth width0.92

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

7.9
Mouth to nose width1.47

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

10.0
Mouth corner position5.7 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

4.8

Ears

0.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio14.91%

Ideal 8 to 12

0.0
Ear protrusion angle19.6 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

6.9 / 10

Jaw slope136.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

5.1
Bigonial width91.45%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

10.0
Lower third proportion27.67%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle94.9 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.3
Neck width91.42%

Ideal 92 to 98

9.9

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.8/ 10 harmony
Charlie Puth side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

5.6 / 10

Browridge inclination13.3 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

7.1
Nasofrontal angle135.4 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

1.6
Upper forehead slope3.8 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

8.0

Profile convexity

8.8 / 10

Z angle75.7 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

7.2
Total facial convexity143.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-1.5 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

4.6
Facial convexity (glabella)169.5 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

9.9
Anterior facial depth66.5 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)165.8 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

10.0
Facial depth to height1.52

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

8.4
Interior midface projection56.9 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

7.6 / 10

Nasal width to height0.90

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

6.4
Nasal projection0.92

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

0.0
Nasolabial angle109.8 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle135.0 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle129.1 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle34.1 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation21.7 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

9.9
Mid nose projection1.5 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

2.2
Frankfort tip angle33.8 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

10.0

Lips

8.3 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.2 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.4 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)2.5 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

2.3
Lower lip (S-line)0.7 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

10.0
Upper lip (E-line)6.1 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

9.8
Lower lip (E-line)3.1 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line-0.9 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

5.7

Chin and jaw

2.3 / 10

Mentolabial angle149.1 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort-8.7 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

0.0
Gonial angle129.4 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

0.0
Mandibular plane angle25.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

4.5
Ramus to mandible ratio0.54

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

4.0
Gonion to mouth line10.5 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

5.6

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle136.6 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal midface ratio

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious midface due to eye spacing and midface length sitting in proportion.

Midface ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal face shape

10.0

This contributes to overall harmony due to face length and width sitting in balanced proportion.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eye shape

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the eye opening being neither overly round nor overly narrow.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.40

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

Long chin or short philtrum

-0.39

The chin is tall for the philtrum above it, which can make the chin dominate the lower face.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.39

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.31

The ears stand out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.28

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.