Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Charli D'Amelio - Facial Harmony Analysis

Dancer and influencer - TikTok, Dancing with the Stars, The D'Amelio Show

Low-set brows over good under-eye support, full lips with the corners in place, and a jaw that holds its width and angle into a clean neckline give the face its structure. Wide temples over a face narrow for its length, eyes set wide with little tilt, lips carried well ahead of the nose and chin, and a long lower face under a shallow chin crease are the limits.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Italian-American
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
7.1 / 10
Charli D'Amelio front portrait
Charli D'Amelio side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Charli D'Amelio's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.2

out of 10

Top 3%

Side view

6.8

out of 10

Top 8.2%

Best looking out of 20 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.2/ 10 harmony
Charli D'Amelio front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

5.3 / 10

Top third29.22%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

7.0
Middle third36.11%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

5.7
Lower third34.67%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

3.1

Face shape

6.0 / 10

Face width to height1.74

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

0.0
Bitemporal width97.09%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

0.0
Midface ratio1.02

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

9.9
10.0
Cheekbone height85.56%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

6.5 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt2.9 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

0.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.79

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.73

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

9.9
Eye separation ratio49.12%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

3.6
One eye apart test1.21

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

5.2
Eyebrow tilt8.2 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

6.6
Brow length to face width0.71

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

10.0

Nose

9.4 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle87.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA2.9 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

9.7
Nose bridge to nose width2.35

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

7.1
Intercanthal to nasal width1.01

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

10.0
Nose tip position1.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

7.1 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.6 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

5.3
Chin to philtrum ratio2.67

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

4.6
Lower to upper lip ratio1.49

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.9
Lip fullness0.38

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.74

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

10.0
Mouth to nose width1.39

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

0.0
Mouth corner position1.1 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

8.5 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio11.37%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle13.5 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

6.9

Jaw, neck and lower face

9.8 / 10

Jaw slope146.3 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

8.9
Bigonial width84.04%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

10.0
Lower third proportion31.08%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle90.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width81.29%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.8/ 10 harmony
Charli D'Amelio side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

8.0 / 10

Browridge inclination19.5 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle141.6 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

10.0
Upper forehead slope4.3 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

4.1

Profile convexity

5.7 / 10

Z angle82.1 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

7.7
Total facial convexity131.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

0.0
Orbital vector1.5 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

10.0
Facial convexity (glabella)171.2 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

10.0
Anterior facial depth71.3 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

7.6
Facial convexity (nasion)170.7 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

0.0
Facial depth to height1.57

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

0.0
Interior midface projection53.6 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

8.7 / 10

Nasal width to height0.67

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

9.9
Nasal projection0.66

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

8.3
Nasolabial angle97.5 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle127.8 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

9.9
Nasomental angle122.2 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

1.1
Nasofacial angle34.5 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation25.7 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

10.0
Mid nose projection-1.0 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle37.9 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

9.1

Lips

5.9 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.4 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.9 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)4.0 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)1.1 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

8.8
Upper lip (E-line)8.2 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

0.9
Lower lip (E-line)3.8 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line-1.4 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

1.6

Chin and jaw

8.3 / 10

Mentolabial angle152.7 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort2.1 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle122.2 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle16.7 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.61

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.9
Gonion to mouth line23.6 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

6.1 / 10

Submental cervical angle88.3 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

6.1

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal lip fullness

10.0

This contributes to attractive lips due to the lip height sitting in proportion with the width of the mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal profile convexity

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to brow, nose base, and chin falling in a gently convex line.

Facial convexity (glabella) (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower face taper

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jawlines tapering at a classical angle.

Jaw frontal angle (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose tip rotation

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip being gently rotated without exposing the nostrils.

Nose tip rotation (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal jaw corner height

10.0

This contributes to a defined jawline due to the jaw corner sitting at a classical height against the mouth.

Gonion to mouth line (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal jaw angle

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking definition or being overly sharp at its corner.

Gonial angle (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.36

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Wide forehead

-0.34

The temples are wide against the cheekbones, which makes the upper face read heavy.

Bitemporal width (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow mouth for the nose

-0.23

The mouth is barely wider than the nose base, which can make the nose read wide.

Mouth to nose width (front view)

severeFront view

Negative canthal tilt

-0.22

The outer eye corners sit low, which can read as tired or downturned eyes.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

severeSide view

Deep face for its height

-0.22

The face carries far back for its height, which can read heavy in profile.

Facial depth to height (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Charli D'Amelio's strongest and weakest features

Charli D'Amelio scores 7.09 overall, with an even front and side (7.24 and 6.84). Her jaw, brows and lips are her strongest features, and her costs are moderate, coming from the midface, the temples and the curve of her profile.

From the front, her full face is ideally proportioned for its width and her cheekbones sit high. Her brows are set low and the right length for the face. The angle from the base of her nose to her outer eye corners is ideal, her nose is sized correctly to the space between her eyes, and its tip sits level with her nostrils. Her lips are full, her mouth is the right width for her pupil distance, and her mouth corners sit well. Her jaw is clean head-on: her bigonial width, the angle where the two sides of her jaw meet, the split of her lower third between lip and chin and her neck width are ideal, and her ears sit flat. In profile, her brow ridge, the step from her brow to her nose, orbital vector and facial convexity through the brow are in band, her nose angles, tip rotation and bridge line are ideal, her midface carries her nose base forward correctly, her lips sit on the Burstone reference with her lower lip on the E-line, her chin sits at the right depth, and her jaw corner angle, jaw plane and jaw corner height are ideal.

Her largest cost is that her midface reads long for the width of her cheekbones, at 1.74 where 1.94 to 1.98 is ideal, which takes about 0.36 of a point. Her temples are wide, at 97.1% of her cheekbone width against 80.1 to 85.7%, which is her weakest single metric at 2.04 out of 10. Her mouth is slightly narrow for her nose, at 1.39 nose widths against 1.52 to 1.6, and her outer eye corners tilt less than ideal, at 2.9 degrees against 7.07 to 8.36. In profile, her face is deep for its height, at 1.57 against 1.3 to 1.44, and her profile curves more than ideal, measured at the nose tip, at 131.8 degrees against 140 to 147.