Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Channing Tatum - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Magic Mike, 21 Jump Street, Step Up

Channing Tatum stacks in even thirds under a heavy brow ridge, with high cheekbones, well-tilted brows, a chin set forward and a well-placed nose over balanced lips. The build is narrower than it reads, with a face short on width for its height, close-set eyes, a short chin, a rounded jaw corner, ears that stand far off the head and no clean line from jaw into neck.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Caucasian
Eyes:
Blue-green
Harmony:
6.7 / 10
Channing Tatum front portrait
Channing Tatum side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Channing Tatum's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.1

out of 10

Top 26%

Side view

7.7

out of 10

Top 0.6%

Best looking out of 9 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.1/ 10 harmony
Channing Tatum front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third31.82%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third33.05%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third35.12%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

5.7 / 10

Face width to height1.75

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width95.49%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

8.4
Midface ratio0.86

Ideal 0.97 to 1

0.0
10.0
Cheekbone height88.01%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

7.2 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt5.7 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

9.9
Eyebrow low setedness0.71

Ideal 0 to 0.45

8.5
Eye aspect ratio2.74

Ideal 3 to 3.5

4.0
Eye separation ratio42.22%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

0.0
One eye apart test1.07

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

10.0
Eyebrow tilt6.9 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

10.0
Brow length to face width0.64

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

8.0

Nose

6.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle79.2 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA5.9 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

6.8
Nose bridge to nose width2.17

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

9.8
Intercanthal to nasal width1.28

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

3.4
Nose tip position1.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

7.6 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.7 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

6.0
Chin to philtrum ratio1.91

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

2.0
Lower to upper lip ratio2.00

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

8.9
Lip fullness0.31

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.84

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

10.0
Mouth to nose width1.34

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

6.2
Mouth corner position1.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

0.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio15.93%

Ideal 8 to 12

0.0
Ear protrusion angle18.4 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

8.3 / 10

Jaw slope139.4 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

9.9
Bigonial width94.33%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

7.5
Lower third proportion34.10%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

6.6
Jaw frontal angle85.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.7
Neck width100.39%

Ideal 92 to 98

7.7

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.7/ 10 harmony
Channing Tatum side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

9.1 / 10

Browridge inclination21.5 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle129.5 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

9.7
Upper forehead slope3.9 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

7.7

Profile convexity

8.3 / 10

Z angle81.5 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

10.0
Total facial convexity143.6 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-0.8 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

7.4
Facial convexity (glabella)174.3 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth67.8 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.9
Facial convexity (nasion)171.0 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

0.0
Facial depth to height1.51

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

8.7
Interior midface projection60.5 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

9.9

Nose

7.7 / 10

Nasal width to height0.77

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.78

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

0.8
Nasolabial angle103.3 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle137.1 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle133.1 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.6
Nasofacial angle30.5 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

9.9
Nose tip rotation27.2 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.0
Mid nose projection-1.2 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle40.7 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

9.0

Lips

8.1 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-3.1 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-3.8 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.3
Upper lip (S-line)2.0 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

7.8
Lower lip (S-line)-0.6 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

9.9
Upper lip (E-line)5.9 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

9.9
Lower lip (E-line)1.9 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line-1.8 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

0.0

Chin and jaw

7.3 / 10

Mentolabial angle137.0 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

3.8
Recession relative to Frankfort9.0 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle128.9 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

0.0
Mandibular plane angle19.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.62

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line20.5 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle131.3 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal nose tip height

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip sitting just below the nostril line.

Nose tip position (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal facial convexity

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to nose projection sitting in proportion with forehead and chin.

Total facial convexity (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal chin position

10.0

This contributes to a strong profile due to the chin sitting classically on the nasion perpendicular.

Recession relative to Frankfort (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal jawline slope

10.0

This contributes to a defined profile due to the jawline running at a classical slope from corner to chin.

Mandibular plane angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose proportions

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to its projection and height sitting in classical proportion.

Nasal width to height (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.44

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.38

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.36

The ears stand out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow alar angle

-0.31

The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

severeFront view

Close-set eyes

-0.23

The eyes sit close together for the width of the face, which can pinch the midface.

Eye separation ratio (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Channing Tatum's strongest and weakest features

Channing Tatum scores 6.70 overall, and his profile outscores his front: 7.69 side against 6.10 front. His facial proportions and profile are his strongest features, and his costs come from the midface, the ears and the neck.

From the front, all three facial thirds are in band, his full face is ideally proportioned for its width, and his cheekbones sit high. His eyes are spaced correctly for their length and his brows are tilted correctly. His nose tip sits level with his nostrils. His lips are full, his mouth is the right width for his pupil distance, and his mouth corners sit well. In profile, his brow ridge, Z angle and facial convexity are in band, his nose length, nose angles and bridge line are ideal, his upper lip sits on the Burstone reference and his lower lip on the E-line, his chin sits at the right depth, and his jaw plane, rear jaw length and jaw corner height are ideal.

His largest cost is that his midface reads long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.75 where 1.96 to 2 is ideal, which takes about 0.44 of a point. His ears are angled out at 18.4 degrees against 10 to 11.5, which is his weakest single metric at 1.55 out of 10, and they protrude at a ratio of 15.9 against 8 to 12. The angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners is narrow, at 79.2 degrees against 86.5 to 92.5, and his eyes sit close, with pupils 42.2% of the face width apart against 45.7 to 46.8%. In profile, his jaw eases into his neck at 131.3 degrees against 94 to 106.