Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Catherine Zeta Jones - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Chicago, The Mask of Zorro, Wednesday, Traffic

Catherine Zeta Jones reads strongest in profile: lips sitting exactly on the line from nose to chin, a straight nose with a defined tip, a deep crease under the lower lip and a jaw corner cut at a clean angle over a well-proportioned ramus. It gives way around the eyes and under the chin, with a flat midface beneath the eye, little rim over the lower lid, temples wide for the face they sit on and a jaw-to-neck line that goes soft.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Welsh, Irish and English
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
8.2 / 10
Catherine Zeta Jones front portrait
Catherine Zeta Jones side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Catherine Zeta Jones's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

8.5

out of 10

Top 0.01%

Side view

7.7

out of 10

Top 0.5%

Best looking out of 2,000 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.5/ 10 harmony
Catherine Zeta Jones front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

8.3 / 10

Top third31.33%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

10.0
Middle third34.23%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third34.44%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

5.0

Face shape

6.3 / 10

Face width to height1.94

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

10.0
Bitemporal width90.88%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

0.0
Midface ratio1.07

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

9.9
1.7
Cheekbone height91.63%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.9 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt5.8 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

8.5
Eyebrow low setedness0.85

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.51

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

5.3
Eye separation ratio46.23%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

9.9
One eye apart test1.16

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

8.6
Eyebrow tilt11.6 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

10.0
Brow length to face width0.63

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

9.9

Nose

6.8 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle87.5 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA8.8 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.21

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

10.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.16

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

3.8
Nose tip position1.4 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

8.6 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.3 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

10.0
Chin to philtrum ratio2.37

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.86

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.9
Lip fullness0.37

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.83

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

7.9
Mouth to nose width1.44

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

3.3
Mouth corner position-0.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

9.1

Ears

8.5 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.09%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle13.4 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

7.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

9.1 / 10

Jaw slope143.4 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

10.0
Bigonial width81.78%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

8.2
Lower third proportion31.40%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle96.3 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

8.1
Neck width82.77%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

9.3

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.7/ 10 harmony
Catherine Zeta Jones side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

5.5 / 10

Browridge inclination11.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

3.9
Nasofrontal angle133.3 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

2.7
Upper forehead slope6.6 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

9.9

Profile convexity

6.0 / 10

Z angle75.2 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

9.4
Total facial convexity141.5 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-3.5 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)164.6 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

3.8
Anterior facial depth73.2 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

4.6
Facial convexity (nasion)161.3 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

10.0
Facial depth to height1.39

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection73.0 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

0.0

Nose

9.4 / 10

Nasal width to height0.63

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

5.7
Nasal projection0.63

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

9.9
Nasolabial angle101.7 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle136.1 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle127.5 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle34.6 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation31.7 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

9.3
Mid nose projection-1.0 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle44.0 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

10.0

Lips

10.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-4.4 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.1 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)-0.6 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)-0.0 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

10.0
Upper lip (E-line)2.4 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)1.6 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line0.3 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

8.9 / 10

Mentolabial angle137.5 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

9.1
Recession relative to Frankfort1.0 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

9.9
Gonial angle122.3 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle23.7 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.69

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line9.7 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

5.1

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle120.3 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal upper lip position (S-line)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the upper lip sitting on Steiner's S-line.

Upper lip (S-line) (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal ear set

10.0

This contributes to a clean facial outline due to the ears sitting close to the head.

Ear protrusion ratio (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal jaw length

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.

Ramus to mandible ratio (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose tip height

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip riding slightly above the nostril line.

Nose tip position (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal lower lip position (Burstone)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the lower lip sitting classically on Burstone's line.

Lower lip (Burstone) (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeSide view

Recessed midface

-0.20

The midface falls away steeply under the eyes, which reads under-projected.

Interior midface projection (side view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.17

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeSide view

Soft chin-neck definition

-0.17

The angle under the chin is open, which reads as a soft or receding under-chin area.

Submental cervical angle (side view)

severeFront view

Wide forehead

-0.17

The temples are wide against the cheekbones, which makes the upper face read heavy.

Bitemporal width (front view)

severeSide view

Sunken under-eye area

-0.15

The socket rim sits behind the eye, which can read as hollow or tired under-eyes.

Orbital vector (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.