Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Cara Delevingne - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model and actor - Burberry campaigns, Paper Towns, Only Murders in the Building

High cheekbones sit over a wide jaw that holds a clean angle all the way into the neck, with tilted eyes spaced right and a profile that runs the nose, lips and chin in one balanced line. The forehead is tall enough to take over the face, the midface is short beneath it, the eyes get little support from the bone under them, and the nose tip turns up over a mouth narrow for it.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
British
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
8.0 / 10
Cara Delevingne front portrait
Cara Delevingne side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Cara Delevingne's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

8.1

out of 10

Top 0.09%

Side view

7.8

out of 10

Top 0.4%

Best looking out of 600 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.1/ 10 harmony
Cara Delevingne front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

3.3 / 10

Top third40.05%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

0.0
Middle third29.44%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

0.0
Lower third30.52%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

10.0

Face shape

9.1 / 10

Face width to height1.97

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

10.0
Bitemporal width86.54%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

9.8
Midface ratio1.02

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

9.9
5.7
Cheekbone height97.40%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.0 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt7.7 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.16

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

5.4
Eye aspect ratio2.52

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

5.7
Eye separation ratio47.07%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

10.0
One eye apart test1.17

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

8.1
Eyebrow tilt15.9 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

9.9
Brow length to face width0.78

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

6.7

Nose

10.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle88.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA1.8 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

9.9
Nose bridge to nose width2.12

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

9.9
Intercanthal to nasal width1.05

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

9.9
Nose tip position0.1 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

7.4 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.5 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

3.9
Chin to philtrum ratio1.99

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

7.7
Lower to upper lip ratio1.69

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.34

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

9.9
Interpupillary to mouth width0.79

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

9.9
Mouth to nose width1.42

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

0.2
Mouth corner position1.7 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

6.8 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio7.14%

Ideal 8 to 12

8.3
Ear protrusion angle7.5 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

5.3

Jaw, neck and lower face

9.2 / 10

Jaw slope145.7 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

9.5
Bigonial width84.39%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

10.0
Lower third proportion34.56%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

6.3
Jaw frontal angle89.9 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width80.95%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.8/ 10 harmony
Cara Delevingne side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

9.9 / 10

Browridge inclination22.3 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.8
Nasofrontal angle139.0 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

9.9
Upper forehead slope9.1 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

9.9

Profile convexity

6.4 / 10

Z angle73.2 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

5.9
Total facial convexity140.3 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-4.2 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)164.7 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

3.9
Anterior facial depth73.1 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

4.7
Facial convexity (nasion)162.8 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

10.0
Facial depth to height1.38

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection64.1 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

6.4

Nose

7.2 / 10

Nasal width to height0.60

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

0.0
Nasal projection0.64

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

9.6
Nasolabial angle118.7 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

7.9
Nasal tip angle125.7 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

8.5
Nasomental angle130.1 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle31.9 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation38.4 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

0.0
Mid nose projection-1.8 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

9.0
Frankfort tip angle47.9 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

9.9

Lips

9.7 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.8 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.2 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)0.3 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)-0.6 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

10.0
Upper lip (E-line)2.6 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)0.6 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

9.8
Holdaway H line-0.7 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

8.2

Chin and jaw

7.6 / 10

Mentolabial angle124.0 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort-4.3 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

0.1
Gonial angle120.4 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle17.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.68

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line9.9 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

5.5

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle102.6 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal jaw length

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.

Ramus to mandible ratio (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal lip ratio

10.0

This contributes to attractive lips due to the lower lip being classically fuller than the upper.

Lower to upper lip ratio (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal depth-to-height balance

10.0

This contributes to a balanced head shape due to facial depth sitting in classical proportion to face height.

Facial depth to height (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal canthal tilt

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the outer corners sitting gently above the inner corners.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eye spacing

10.0

This contributes to a balanced midface due to the eyes sitting neither too close together nor too far apart.

Eye separation ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower face taper

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jawlines tapering at a classical angle.

Jaw frontal angle (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Tall forehead

-0.32

The forehead takes up more of the face than ideal, drawing attention away from the eyes and midface.

Top third (front view)

severeFront view

Short midface

-0.19

The midface is compressed relative to the other thirds, which can crowd the eyes and nose together.

Middle third (front view)

severeSide view

Sunken under-eye area

-0.17

The socket rim sits behind the eye, which can read as hollow or tired under-eyes.

Orbital vector (side view)

severeFront view

Narrow mouth for the nose

-0.16

The mouth is barely wider than the nose base, which can make the nose read wide.

Mouth to nose width (front view)

severeSide view

Over-rotated nose tip

-0.14

The nostril axis points high, which can expose the nostrils.

Nose tip rotation (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Cara Delevingne's strongest and weakest features

Cara Delevingne scores 8.01 overall, 8.12 front and 7.83 side. Her eyes, lips, jaw and profile convexity are her strongest features, and her costs come from a tall upper third, a short middle third and the nose and cheek in profile.

From the front, her lower third is in band, her midface is ideally proportioned for the width of her cheekbones, and her cheekbones sit high. Her outer eye corners tilt correctly and her pupils sit the right distance apart for her face width. The angle from the base of her nose to her outer eye corners is ideal and her nose tip sits level with her nostrils. Her upper and lower lips are in proportion and her mouth corners sit well. Her jaw is the right width, its angle toward the chin is ideal, and her neck is the right width. In profile, her facial convexity is in band at the nose tip and at the nose base, and her face is deep for its height as the ideal asks. Her nasomental and nasofacial angles are ideal. Her lips sit on the Burstone and S-line references for both lips and the E-line for the upper lip, and her mentolabial angle, jaw corner, jaw plane, jaw proportions and jaw-to-neck angle are all ideal.

Her largest cost is a tall upper third, at 40.1% of face height against 30.4 to 33.6%, which is her weakest single metric at 1.61 out of 10. Her middle third is short, taking up 29.4% of the face against 32.2 to 34.8%, which takes about 0.19 of a point. In profile, the front of her cheek sits behind the front of her eye, at an orbital vector of -4.2 against 1 to 10, her nose tip is rotated upward, at 38.4 degrees against 19.8 to 29.9, and her nose's forward length is short for its height, at 0.60 against 0.67 to 0.83. From the front, her mouth is narrow for her nose, at 1.42 nose widths against 1.52 to 1.6.