Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Brie Larson - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Room, Captain Marvel, Short Term 12

Brie Larson's mouth and midface carry the face, with a defined cupid's bow, a mouth cut to match the nose width, a compact midface and ears held flat to the head. The frame is the weaker read: wide temples over a rounded jaw corner, close-set eyes under a steep brow ridge, a tip that drops toward the lip and no line between jaw and neck.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
French-Canadian, English and Swedish
Eyes:
Hazel
Harmony:
5.0 / 10
Brie Larson front portrait
Brie Larson side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Brie Larson's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

4.1

out of 10

Bottom 33%

Side view

6.3

out of 10

Top 21%

Worst looking out of 2 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

4.1/ 10 harmony
Brie Larson front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

6.7 / 10

Top third36.23%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

0.0
Middle third33.45%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third30.32%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

10.0

Face shape

2.0 / 10

Face width to height1.73

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

0.0
Bitemporal width92.82%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

0.0
Midface ratio0.91

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

0.0
0.0
Cheekbone height90.03%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

4.8 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt5.9 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

8.7
Eyebrow low setedness0.82

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.10

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

0.0
Eye separation ratio43.64%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

0.0
One eye apart test0.85

Ideal 0.95 to 1

0.0
Eyebrow tilt7.9 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

5.3
Brow length to face width0.62

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

9.5

Nose

1.3 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle79.9 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA18.0 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width1.89

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.19

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

1.2
Nose tip position3.8 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

5.2

Mouth and lips

7.3 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.4 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

10.0
Chin to philtrum ratio2.19

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.70

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.31

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

3.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.88

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

0.9
Mouth to nose width1.58

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

10.0
Mouth corner position4.8 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

7.4

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.11%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle10.8 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

10.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

8.4 / 10

Jaw slope138.4 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

6.0
Bigonial width88.52%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

9.9
Lower third proportion32.95%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle97.9 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

5.9
Neck width79.78%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.3/ 10 harmony
Brie Larson side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.3 / 10

Browridge inclination22.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.1
Nasofrontal angle124.4 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

0.0
Upper forehead slope9.3 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

9.9

Profile convexity

5.4 / 10

Z angle86.4 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

0.0
Total facial convexity147.6 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

9.9
Orbital vector-1.7 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

3.5
Facial convexity (glabella)176.7 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

2.7
Anterior facial depth67.7 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.9
Facial convexity (nasion)173.3 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

0.0
Facial depth to height1.46

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

9.3
Interior midface projection63.4 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

7.6

Nose

8.0 / 10

Nasal width to height0.72

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.76

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

0.0
Nasolabial angle93.9 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

8.5
Nasal tip angle134.2 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle132.5 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.0
Nasofacial angle32.5 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation33.2 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

7.5
Mid nose projection-2.2 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

6.8
Frankfort tip angle45.8 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

10.0

Lips

8.4 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-4.8 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-1.6 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)1.1 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

8.0
Lower lip (S-line)2.0 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

2.5
Upper lip (E-line)5.6 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

8.6
Lower lip (E-line)4.7 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

9.9
Holdaway H line1.3 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

9.9

Chin and jaw

8.4 / 10

Mentolabial angle140.3 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

6.6
Recession relative to Frankfort11.2 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle113.8 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

4.1
Mandibular plane angle14.3 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.4
Ramus to mandible ratio0.63

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line22.7 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle131.0 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow height

10.0

This contributes to a defined eye area due to the brows sitting at a classical height above the eyes.

Eyebrow low setedness (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal Cupid's bow

10.0

This contributes to a defined upper lip due to a visible but moderate bow.

Cupid's bow depth (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal chin-philtrum balance

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to chin height and philtrum length sitting in classical proportion.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.45

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.40

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow intercanthal spacing

-0.36

There is less than one eye-width of space between the eyes, which reads close-set.

One eye apart test (front view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.33

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow alar angle

-0.32

The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.