Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Ansel Elgort - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Baby Driver, The Fault in Our Stars, West Side Story

Ansel Elgort stacks in even thirds over a well-shaped nose, a real crease under the lip and a jaw that cuts clean into the neck. The jaw goes blunt rather than tapered head-on, and the eye area gives ground, with flat high-set brows, eyes on almost no tilt, hollow under-eyes and lips set back behind the line.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
American Jewish
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
6.7 / 10
Ansel Elgort front portrait
Ansel Elgort side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Ansel Elgort's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.1

out of 10

Top 26%

Side view

7.7

out of 10

Top 0.6%

Best looking out of 9 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.1/ 10 harmony
Ansel Elgort front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third31.11%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third33.08%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third35.80%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

7.9 / 10

Face width to height1.93

Ideal 1.96 to 2

9.4
Bitemporal width92.07%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio1.01

Ideal 0.97 to 1

9.9
0.0
Cheekbone height88.29%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

4.8 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt3.6 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

1.8
Eyebrow low setedness0.95

Ideal 0 to 0.45

4.0
Eye aspect ratio2.97

Ideal 3 to 3.5

9.9
Eye separation ratio44.35%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

7.5
One eye apart test1.26

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

0.8
Eyebrow tilt0.8 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

0.0
Brow length to face width0.66

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

9.2

Nose

6.7 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle83.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

4.8
Deviation of IAA and JFA27.8 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.13

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

10.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.21

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

8.9
Nose tip position0.7 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

8.0 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.7 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

5.3
Chin to philtrum ratio2.41

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.37

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

8.5
Lip fullness0.35

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.80

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

9.5
Mouth to nose width1.31

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

2.6
Mouth corner position0.3 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

3.8 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio12.77%

Ideal 8 to 12

7.6
Ear protrusion angle16.6 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

5.4 / 10

Jaw slope132.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

0.0
Bigonial width84.61%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

7.2
Lower third proportion32.88%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle111.5 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Neck width93.09%

Ideal 92 to 98

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.7/ 10 harmony
Ansel Elgort side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

9.9 / 10

Browridge inclination22.5 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Nasofrontal angle127.5 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

10.0
Upper forehead slope2.8 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

9.7

Profile convexity

4.9 / 10

Z angle72.4 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

0.0
Total facial convexity147.0 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-2.3 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

1.4
Facial convexity (glabella)172.1 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth73.5 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

2.4
Facial convexity (nasion)167.1 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

9.4
Facial depth to height1.56

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

5.8
Interior midface projection65.5 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

0.0

Nose

8.7 / 10

Nasal width to height0.72

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.75

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

4.2
Nasolabial angle80.8 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

5.2
Nasal tip angle140.3 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

9.1
Nasomental angle130.5 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle32.6 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation22.6 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

9.6
Mid nose projection-0.7 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle38.8 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

9.9

Lips

5.5 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-8.1 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

2.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-4.7 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

5.3
Upper lip (S-line)-3.1 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)-1.9 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

2.1
Upper lip (E-line)0.8 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

9.9
Lower lip (E-line)0.2 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

9.3
Holdaway H line-0.2 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

9.9

Chin and jaw

8.6 / 10

Mentolabial angle120.2 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort0.6 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

9.9
Gonial angle111.5 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

3.7
Mandibular plane angle15.8 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.58

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

8.0
Gonion to mouth line17.3 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle103.7 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal chin crease

10.0

This contributes to a defined chin due to the lip-chin transition being defined but soft.

Mentolabial angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal profile convexity

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to brow, nose base, and chin falling in a gently convex line.

Facial convexity (glabella) (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nasofacial angle

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the nose lifting off the facial plane at a classical angle.

Nasofacial angle (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealSide view

Straight nasal bridge

10.0

This contributes to a refined profile due to the bridge running straight from root to tip.

Mid nose projection (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.42

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Square lower face

-0.34

The jawlines run wide apart, which squares the lower face.

Jaw frontal angle (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.34

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

Flat eyebrow tilt

-0.25

The brows rise little toward their peaks, which can read heavy or tired.

Eyebrow tilt (front view)

severeFront view

Overly sharp jaw corner

-0.25

The jaw turns more sharply than the reference range, which can read harsh.

Jaw slope (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Ansel Elgort's strongest and weakest features

Ansel Elgort scores 6.71 overall, and his profile outscores his front: 7.70 side against 6.10 front. His facial proportions and his profile are his strongest features, and his costs come from the jaw shape, the ears and the brows seen head-on.

From the front, all three facial thirds and his temples are in band, and his cheekbones sit high. His nose bridge is in proportion to his nostrils and his nose tip sits level with them. His chin is in proportion to his philtrum, his lips are full, his mouth corners sit well, and the split of his lower third between lip and chin and his neck width are ideal. In profile, the step from his brow to his nose and his facial convexity are in band, his nose length, nose angles and bridge line are ideal, and his mentolabial angle, jaw plane, jaw corner height and submental angle are ideal, so his jaw meets his neck at a clean angle.

His largest cost is the jaw taper: his jaw stays wide toward the chin, with the two sides meeting at 111.5 degrees against 86.5 to 92.5, so it differs from the angle from his nose base to his outer eye corners by 27.8 degrees against 2.5 or less, which is his weakest single metric at 0.84 out of 10. His jaw slope reads 132.1 degrees against 140 to 142.5. His ears are angled out at 16.6 degrees against 10 to 11.5. His brows sit nearly flat, tilting at 0.8 degrees against 6.5 to 11, and his face is short for its width, at 1.27 against 1.34 to 1.37.