Celebrity analysis

How attractive is AnnaSophia Robb - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Bridge to Terabithia, Soul Surfer, The Carrie Diaries

AnnaSophia Robb's eye area carries the face, with eyes spaced one apart at a hunter tilt, long brows across the full eye line and high cheekbones under an even forehead and midface. Below the nose it thins out, with a square jaw that no longer follows the midface taper, thin lips over a flat cupid's bow, a chin set back with barely any crease, and a nose that projects well forward of it.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Norwegian, Swedish, Danish, German and English
Eyes:
Green
Harmony:
7.5 / 10
AnnaSophia Robb front portrait
AnnaSophia Robb side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

AnnaSophia Robb's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.5

out of 10

Top 1.3%

Side view

7.5

out of 10

Top 1.3%

Best looking out of 80 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.5/ 10 harmony
AnnaSophia Robb front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.2 / 10

Top third32.40%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

10.0
Middle third33.52%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third34.08%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

7.5

Face shape

7.4 / 10

Face width to height1.82

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

0.0
Bitemporal width87.28%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

8.9
Midface ratio1.11

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

8.1
9.9
Cheekbone height86.57%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.8 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt7.0 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

9.9
Eyebrow low setedness1.14

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

8.8
Eye aspect ratio2.47

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

3.9
Eye separation ratio48.07%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

9.3
One eye apart test1.02

Ideal 0.95 to 1

9.9
Eyebrow tilt11.4 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

10.0
Brow length to face width0.69

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

10.0

Nose

6.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle89.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA15.4 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width1.86

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.02

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

10.0
Nose tip position1.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

7.8 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.5 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

3.1
Chin to philtrum ratio2.57

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

8.6
Lower to upper lip ratio1.69

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.31

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

3.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.80

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

9.8
Mouth to nose width1.54

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

10.0
Mouth corner position2.1 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

7.4 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.28%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle14.0 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

4.9

Jaw, neck and lower face

5.8 / 10

Jaw slope140.3 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

9.2
Bigonial width81.17%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

6.8
Lower third proportion30.39%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

3.0
Jaw frontal angle105.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Neck width80.86%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.5/ 10 harmony
AnnaSophia Robb side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.6 / 10

Browridge inclination25.0 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Nasofrontal angle141.1 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

10.0
Upper forehead slope9.3 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

9.9

Profile convexity

7.3 / 10

Z angle79.0 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

10.0
Total facial convexity148.0 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

9.8
Orbital vector-0.2 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

8.8
Facial convexity (glabella)171.2 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

10.0
Anterior facial depth64.3 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.9
Facial convexity (nasion)170.0 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

0.0
Facial depth to height1.54

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

0.0
Interior midface projection56.1 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

8.1 / 10

Nasal width to height0.71

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.76

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

0.0
Nasolabial angle110.8 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle133.8 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle134.2 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

4.9
Nasofacial angle29.8 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

8.2
Nose tip rotation27.6 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

10.0
Mid nose projection-1.0 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle40.9 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

10.0

Lips

8.5 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.4 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.9 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)1.3 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

6.8
Lower lip (S-line)-0.5 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

10.0
Upper lip (E-line)4.2 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

9.9
Lower lip (E-line)1.4 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line-1.3 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

2.9

Chin and jaw

7.2 / 10

Mentolabial angle152.1 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort-3.1 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

3.1
Gonial angle121.5 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle16.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.73

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line18.4 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle97.9 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eyebrow tilt

10.0

This contributes to a lively eye area due to the brows rising gently toward their peaks.

Eyebrow tilt (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow length

10.0

This contributes to a framed eye area due to the brows spanning the eyes in proportion to the face.

Brow length to face width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal alar angle

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base sitting in classical relation to the eye corners.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.31

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Square lower face

-0.24

The jawlines run wide apart, which squares the lower face.

Jaw frontal angle (front view)

severeFront view

Wide nose bridge

-0.22

The bridge is wide relative to the nose base, which can make the nose read heavy at the top.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.21

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeSide view

Effaced chin crease

-0.19

The crease between lip and chin is flat, which softens chin definition.

Mentolabial angle (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.