Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Alix Earle - Facial Harmony Analysis

Influencer - TikTok, Hot Mess podcast, Sports Illustrated Swimsuit

Alix Earle's lower face carries her, with a clean jaw-to-neck line, a defined jaw corner and a short, upturned nose sitting neatly over the lip. The frame is the weaker read: a wide, short face, a flat brow ridge, a long midface and a small mouth against the eye spacing.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Italian-American
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
5.5 / 10
Alix Earle front portrait
Alix Earle side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Alix Earle's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

5.4

out of 10

Top 44%

Side view

5.6

out of 10

Top 40%

Best looking out of 2 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.4/ 10 harmony
Alix Earle front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.2 / 10

Top third34.71%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

7.5
Middle third33.77%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third31.52%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

10.0

Face shape

2.0 / 10

Face width to height1.69

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

0.0
Bitemporal width90.93%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

0.0
Midface ratio0.89

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

0.0
0.0
Cheekbone height91.75%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

6.8 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt9.3 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

9.3
Eyebrow low setedness0.98

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

9.9
Eye aspect ratio2.13

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

0.0
Eye separation ratio44.05%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

0.0
One eye apart test1.17

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

8.2
Eyebrow tilt14.0 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

10.0
Brow length to face width0.66

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

10.0

Nose

4.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle78.6 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA13.0 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width1.89

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.04

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

10.0
Nose tip position2.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

6.5 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.5 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

3.8
Chin to philtrum ratio2.35

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.44

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.4
Lip fullness0.35

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.92

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

0.0
Mouth to nose width1.67

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

2.6
Mouth corner position3.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.82%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle11.9 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

9.9

Jaw, neck and lower face

9.5 / 10

Jaw slope140.5 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

9.3
Bigonial width87.46%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

10.0
Lower third proportion33.22%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle91.6 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width83.55%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

8.1

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.6/ 10 harmony
Alix Earle side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

3.2 / 10

Browridge inclination26.9 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Nasofrontal angle138.2 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

9.6
Upper forehead slope12.6 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

0.0

Profile convexity

6.0 / 10

Z angle76.0 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

9.9
Total facial convexity152.3 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

2.4
Orbital vector-2.2 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

1.3
Facial convexity (glabella)171.4 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

10.0
Anterior facial depth66.3 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)168.1 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

0.2
Facial depth to height1.49

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

4.5
Interior midface projection55.4 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

5.5 / 10

Nasal width to height0.65

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

8.3
Nasal projection0.69

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

5.2
Nasolabial angle86.0 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

0.0
Nasal tip angle141.9 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

6.2
Nasomental angle137.1 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

0.0
Nasofacial angle26.8 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

0.0
Nose tip rotation27.5 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

10.0
Mid nose projection-0.3 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle41.2 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

10.0

Lips

4.6 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-5.7 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

9.8
Lower lip (Burstone)-5.7 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

0.0
Upper lip (S-line)-1.5 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

9.9
Lower lip (S-line)-3.4 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)1.7 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)-1.6 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

2.6
Holdaway H line-2.5 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

0.0

Chin and jaw

10.0 / 10

Mentolabial angle130.5 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort1.3 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

9.9
Gonial angle123.3 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle17.3 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.61

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.9
Gonion to mouth line15.8 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle119.0 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal upper lip position (E-line)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the upper lip sitting classically just behind Ricketts' E-line.

Upper lip (E-line) (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealSide view

Straight nasal bridge

10.0

This contributes to a refined profile due to the bridge running straight from root to tip.

Mid nose projection (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal profile convexity

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to brow, nose base, and chin falling in a gently convex line.

Facial convexity (glabella) (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal midface projection

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the nose base carrying classically forward of the ear.

Anterior facial depth (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.48

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Long, narrow face shape

-0.36

The face is long for its width, which can read stretched.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow alar angle

-0.34

The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.32

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.30

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.