Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Alexandra Daddario - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - The White Lotus, Percy Jackson, Baywatch

Alexandra Daddario's nose and mouth sit right, with a well-cut nose placed to the eye line, balanced lips, high cheekbones, low-set brows and eyes spaced exactly one apart. The build is the drag, running wide for its height with a long lower face on a long chin, a flat brow-to-nose step and lips carried forward of the profile.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Italian-American
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
6.7 / 10
Alexandra Daddario front portrait
Alexandra Daddario side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Alexandra Daddario's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.3

out of 10

Top 21%

Side view

7.4

out of 10

Top 2.1%

Best looking out of 9 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.3/ 10 harmony
Alexandra Daddario front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

6.5 / 10

Top third29.80%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

9.4
Middle third32.98%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third37.22%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

0.0

Face shape

6.4 / 10

Face width to height2.04

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

3.5
Bitemporal width87.49%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

8.5
Midface ratio1.01

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

9.8
0.0
Cheekbone height90.84%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

5.9 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt6.3 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

9.6
Eyebrow low setedness0.53

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.30

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

0.0
Eye separation ratio42.86%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

0.0
One eye apart test0.96

Ideal 0.95 to 1

10.0
Eyebrow tilt7.1 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

1.9
Brow length to face width0.63

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

9.9

Nose

7.2 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle87.4 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA8.2 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.1
Nose bridge to nose width2.17

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

10.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.14

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

5.8
Nose tip position1.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

5.7 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.3 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

0.3
Chin to philtrum ratio2.79

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.43

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.2
Lip fullness0.34

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.89

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

0.0
Mouth to nose width1.56

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

10.0
Mouth corner position0.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

7.7 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio11.99%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle13.9 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

5.3

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.4 / 10

Jaw slope142.0 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

9.9
Bigonial width84.41%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

10.0
Lower third proportion30.68%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

8.1
Jaw frontal angle95.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

8.7
Neck width91.95%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

0.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.4/ 10 harmony
Alexandra Daddario side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

2.7 / 10

Browridge inclination8.3 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Nasofrontal angle136.6 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

8.2
Upper forehead slope2.9 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

0.0

Profile convexity

6.4 / 10

Z angle85.5 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

0.0
Total facial convexity140.5 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-0.9 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

6.5
Facial convexity (glabella)172.1 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

10.0
Anterior facial depth67.5 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.9
Facial convexity (nasion)170.1 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

0.0
Facial depth to height1.38

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection65.0 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

4.7

Nose

9.2 / 10

Nasal width to height0.67

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

9.9
Nasal projection0.67

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

7.7
Nasolabial angle102.1 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle140.5 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

8.7
Nasomental angle129.3 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle32.3 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation23.8 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

10.0
Mid nose projection0.9 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

8.7
Frankfort tip angle36.9 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

7.6

Lips

6.9 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-1.4 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

9.9
Lower lip (Burstone)-0.7 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.9
Upper lip (S-line)3.2 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)1.9 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

2.9
Upper lip (E-line)6.8 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

5.5
Lower lip (E-line)3.9 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line0.1 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

9.8 / 10

Mentolabial angle127.8 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort4.0 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle117.0 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

9.9
Mandibular plane angle20.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.64

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line12.0 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

9.2

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle116.7 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow height

10.0

This contributes to a defined eye area due to the brows sitting at a classical height above the eyes.

Eyebrow low setedness (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal intercanthal spacing

10.0

This contributes to eye-area harmony due to close to one eye-width of space between the eyes.

One eye apart test (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal alar angle

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base sitting in classical relation to the eye corners.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose flare

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the base widening in proportion to the bridge.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Long lower face

-0.34

The lower face takes up more than its classical share, which can make the chin and jaw dominate the face.

Lower third (front view)

severeFront view

Wide neck

-0.34

The neck is wide against the jaw, which can blur the jawline's definition.

Neck width (front view)

severeFront view

Close-set eyes

-0.28

The eyes sit close together for the width of the face, which can pinch the midface.

Eye separation ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Short, wide face shape

-0.24

The face is short for its width, which can read compact and heavy.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.22

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.