Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Alex Schlab - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model and actor - Burberry campaigns, Geek Girl

Alex Schlab is even through the middle, with a compact frame, high cheekbones, tilted brows, a nose placed to the eye line and lips balanced over a chin proportioned to the upper lip. The nose and jaw are where it leaks, with a bridge narrow against the width of the nose, a tip rotated up, a rounder eye shape, eyes set a touch wide, a narrow jaw and ears that carry out.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Chinese-German American
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
7.2 / 10
Alex Schlab front portrait
Alex Schlab side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Alex Schlab's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.9

out of 10

Top 6.5%

Side view

7.7

out of 10

Top 0.7%

Best looking out of 30 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.9/ 10 harmony
Alex Schlab front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

8.9 / 10

Top third33.11%

Ideal 30 to 32

8.8
Middle third34.05%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

9.3
Lower third32.84%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

8.4

Face shape

7.8 / 10

Face width to height1.78

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width92.03%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio0.93

Ideal 0.97 to 1

8.8
10.0
Cheekbone height89.82%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

6.4 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt8.2 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

9.7
Eyebrow low setedness0.74

Ideal 0 to 0.45

7.9
Eye aspect ratio2.42

Ideal 3 to 3.5

0.0
Eye separation ratio44.35%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

7.5
One eye apart test1.14

Ideal 0.95 to 1

0.4
Eyebrow tilt8.8 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

10.0
Brow length to face width0.66

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

9.4

Nose

4.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle81.6 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA12.3 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.44

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.10

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

10.0
Nose tip position2.6 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

9.9 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.2 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

9.9
Chin to philtrum ratio2.34

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.43

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.4
Lip fullness0.35

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.86

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

10.0
Mouth to nose width1.41

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

9.9
Mouth corner position0.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

4.6 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio12.47%

Ideal 8 to 12

9.2
Ear protrusion angle14.6 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

8.1 / 10

Jaw slope144.7 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

8.2
Bigonial width82.62%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

2.3
Lower third proportion33.26%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle93.9 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.8
Neck width92.54%

Ideal 92 to 98

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.7/ 10 harmony
Alex Schlab side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

9.5 / 10

Browridge inclination21.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle123.3 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

10.0
Upper forehead slope3.5 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

8.6

Profile convexity

6.0 / 10

Z angle85.2 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

6.7
Total facial convexity159.0 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

0.0
Orbital vector0.2 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

9.6
Facial convexity (glabella)176.7 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

8.3
Anterior facial depth65.0 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)169.8 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

2.7
Facial depth to height1.63

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

1.0
Interior midface projection54.9 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

6.7 / 10

Nasal width to height0.69

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.71

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

8.9
Nasolabial angle87.7 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

8.5
Nasal tip angle137.7 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle139.4 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

1.9
Nasofacial angle27.9 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

4.9
Nose tip rotation26.7 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.9
Mid nose projection-0.3 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle43.9 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

4.8

Lips

8.7 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-5.3 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

9.9
Lower lip (Burstone)-0.8 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.9
Upper lip (S-line)-1.3 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

7.3
Lower lip (S-line)1.5 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

9.8
Upper lip (E-line)2.1 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)3.4 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line2.2 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

3.6

Chin and jaw

8.1 / 10

Mentolabial angle144.0 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort14.0 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle118.8 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle11.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

8.7
Ramus to mandible ratio0.70

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line25.4 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle103.1 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal forehead width

10.0

This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.

Bitemporal width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal face shape

10.0

This contributes to overall harmony due to face length and width sitting in balanced proportion.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eyebrow tilt

10.0

This contributes to a lively eye area due to the brows rising gently toward their peaks.

Eyebrow tilt (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose width

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base spanning just over the space between the eyes, per the classical guideline.

Intercanthal to nasal width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose tip height

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip riding slightly above the nostril line.

Nose tip position (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.37

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Flared nose base

-0.29

The nose base is wide relative to the bridge, which can make the nostrils read flared.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.28

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.27

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.23

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.