Celebrity analysis
How attractive is Alex Schlab - Facial Harmony Analysis
Model and actor - Burberry campaigns, Geek Girl
Alex Schlab is even through the middle, with a compact frame, high cheekbones, tilted brows, a nose placed to the eye line and lips balanced over a chin proportioned to the upper lip. The nose and jaw are where it leaks, with a bridge narrow against the width of the nose, a tip rotated up, a rounder eye shape, eyes set a touch wide, a narrow jaw and ears that carry out.
- Gender:
- Male
- Ethnicity:
- Chinese-German American
- Eyes:
- Brown
- Harmony:
- 7.2 / 10
Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.
Signature tool
See my closest celebrity match
Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.
Harmony report
Alex Schlab's facial harmony
Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.
Overall harmony
7.2
out of 10
Top 3.1%
Front view
6.9
out of 10
Top 6.5%
Side view
7.7
out of 10
Top 0.7%
Best looking out of 30 people
Front harmony
Front analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Facial thirds
8.9 / 10
Face shape
7.8 / 10
Eyes and brows
6.4 / 10
Nose
4.0 / 10
Mouth and lips
9.9 / 10
Ears
4.6 / 10
Jaw, neck and lower face
8.1 / 10
Side harmony
Side analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Forehead and brow
9.5 / 10
Profile convexity
6.0 / 10
Nose
6.7 / 10
Lips
8.7 / 10
Chin and jaw
8.1 / 10
Neck
10.0 / 10
Biggest strengths
These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.
Ideal nose width
10.0This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base spanning just over the space between the eyes, per the classical guideline.
Intercanthal to nasal width (front view)
Ideal eyebrow tilt
10.0This contributes to a lively eye area due to the brows rising gently toward their peaks.
Eyebrow tilt (front view)
Straight nasal bridge
10.0This contributes to a refined profile due to the bridge running straight from root to tip.
Mid nose projection (side view)
Ideal cheekbone height
10.0This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.
Cheekbone height (front view)
Ideal nasofrontal angle
10.0This contributes to a refined profile due to the forehead flowing into the nose at a classical angle.
Nasofrontal angle (side view)
Ideal jaw length
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
Ramus to mandible ratio (side view)
Areas to improve
5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.
Narrow midface
-0.37The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.
Face width to height (front view)
Flared nose base
-0.29The nose base is wide relative to the bridge, which can make the nostrils read flared.
Nose bridge to nose width (front view)
Round eyes
-0.28The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.
Eye aspect ratio (front view)
Midface-jaw mismatch
-0.27The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.
Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)
Protruding ears
-0.23The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.
Ear protrusion angle (front view)
Celebrity lookalikes
Both profilesLoading the celebrity library...
Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.
Alex Schlab's strongest and weakest features
Alex Schlab scores 7.22 overall, and his profile outscores his front: 7.68 side against 6.94 front. His profile, lips, chin and jaw line are his strongest features, and his costs come from a long midface, the nose from the front, round eye openings, the jaw shape and his ears.
From the front, his temples are in band, his full face is ideally proportioned for its width, and his cheekbones sit high. His brows tilt correctly, his nose is sized correctly to the space between his eyes, and his nose tip sits level with his nostrils. His chin is in proportion to his philtrum, his lips are full, his mouth is the right width for his eyes, his upper lip is the ideal length, his mouth corners sit well, and his neck is the right width. In profile, his forehead leans back from the brow correctly, the step from his brow to his nose is in band, and the angle at his ear notch between his nostril crease and lower eyelid is ideal. His midface carries his nose base forward correctly, his nose length, tip angle and mid nose projection are ideal, both lips sit on the E-line, his chin sits correctly forward, and his jaw corner, jaw proportions, jaw corner height and jaw-to-neck angle are all ideal.
His largest cost is that his midface reads long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.78 where 1.96 to 2 is ideal, which takes about 0.37 of a point. His nose bridge reads narrow against his nostrils, at 2.44 against 2.06 to 2.14, which is his weakest single metric at 3.37 out of 10, and his eye openings read round, at an aspect ratio of 2.42 against 3 to 3.5. His jaw angle differs from the angle from nose base to outer eye corners by 12.3 degrees, where 2.5 or less is ideal. His ears stand out from his head at 14.6 degrees against 10 to 11.5, and the angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners is narrow, at 81.6 degrees against 86.5 to 92.5.