Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Alessandra Ambrosio - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model - Victoria's Secret Angel, Armani Exchange, Colcci

Alessandra Ambrosio has upturned eyes, high cheekbones, well-set brows, full, well-balanced lips and a well-shaped nose over a strong chin. Her jaw runs flat and square from the front, her lips push forward, her chin runs long under a short philtrum and her nose bridge dips deep between the eyes.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Brazilian (Italian, Polish and Portuguese)
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
6.4 / 10
Alessandra Ambrosio front portrait
Alessandra Ambrosio side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Alessandra Ambrosio's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.7

out of 10

Top 12%

Side view

6.1

out of 10

Top 27%

Best looking out of 6 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.7/ 10 harmony
Alessandra Ambrosio front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

6.4 / 10

Top third34.45%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

8.6
Middle third30.95%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

6.8
Lower third34.60%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

3.7

Face shape

8.9 / 10

Face width to height1.98

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

9.9
Bitemporal width88.90%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

5.0
Midface ratio1.01

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

9.7
9.6
Cheekbone height91.90%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.4 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt9.6 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

8.8
Eyebrow low setedness0.38

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

9.7
Eye aspect ratio2.45

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

3.1
Eye separation ratio45.73%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

9.0
One eye apart test1.16

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

8.4
Eyebrow tilt12.3 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

10.0
Brow length to face width0.63

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

9.9

Nose

7.3 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle84.3 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

6.6
Deviation of IAA and JFA19.7 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.15

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

10.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.01

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

10.0
Nose tip position3.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

6.3 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.1 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

9.7
Chin to philtrum ratio2.89

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.61

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.36

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.88

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

0.8
Mouth to nose width1.67

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

3.5
Mouth corner position4.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

9.9

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio8.67%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle11.1 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

10.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

2.0 / 10

Jaw slope135.8 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

0.0
Bigonial width84.74%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

10.0
Lower third proportion29.63%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle104.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Neck width87.35%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

0.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.1/ 10 harmony
Alessandra Ambrosio side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

4.0 / 10

Browridge inclination18.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle122.7 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

0.0
Upper forehead slope3.8 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

1.9

Profile convexity

6.2 / 10

Z angle86.1 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

0.0
Total facial convexity146.0 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector0.8 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

9.9
Facial convexity (glabella)174.1 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

10.0
Anterior facial depth66.2 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)169.5 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

0.0
Facial depth to height1.58

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

0.0
Interior midface projection53.0 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

9.9

Nose

8.3 / 10

Nasal width to height0.78

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.79

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

0.0
Nasolabial angle108.5 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle134.4 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle128.2 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle34.8 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation34.6 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

4.9
Mid nose projection-1.4 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

9.9
Frankfort tip angle46.3 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

10.0

Lips

6.4 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.0 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-1.1 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)3.3 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)2.4 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)7.0 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

4.8
Lower lip (E-line)4.9 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

9.8
Holdaway H line0.2 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

6.9 / 10

Mentolabial angle139.9 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

7.0
Recession relative to Frankfort7.7 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle114.0 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

4.7
Mandibular plane angle9.7 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.62

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line29.0 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle106.0 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal chin position

10.0

This contributes to a strong profile due to the chin sitting classically on the nasion perpendicular.

Recession relative to Frankfort (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal midface projection

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the nose base carrying classically forward of the ear.

Anterior facial depth (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal forehead slope

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the forehead leaning back at a classical angle.

Browridge inclination (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose-chin balance

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to nose projection and chin position complementing each other.

Nasomental angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose tip definition

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip being defined without being pinched.

Nasal tip angle (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.37

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.30

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Long chin or short philtrum

-0.25

The chin is tall for the philtrum above it, which can make the chin dominate the lower face.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

severeSide view

Deep-set nasal root

-0.24

The transition from forehead to nose is sharp, which can read as a heavy brow or deep root.

Nasofrontal angle (side view)

severeSide view

Deep face for its height

-0.24

The face carries far back for its height, which can read heavy in profile.

Facial depth to height (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.